On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, David Higgs wrote:
> To reiterate for personal clarity, section 2 manpages for syscalls
> actually refers to the corresponding libc interfaces? That makes
> sense in that no userland code would be using syscalls directly due to
> complications like errno handling.
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:06 PM, David Higgs wrote:
>> It seems the sigprocmask syscall takes different arguments than the
>> libc stub for sigprocmask(2). Though the differences are easily
>> understood by browsing source, there don't appe
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:06 PM, David Higgs wrote:
> It seems the sigprocmask syscall takes different arguments than the
> libc stub for sigprocmask(2). Though the differences are easily
> understood by browsing source, there don't appear to be any man pages
> describing the syscall interface, an
3 matches
Mail list logo
