On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 06:27:19PM +0100, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 06:49:33AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> >> Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> >> > On Sun, Mar 22,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 06:27:19PM +0100, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 06:49:33AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >> Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:16:08AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >> > >
> >>
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 06:49:33AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:16:08AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > >
>> > > If the firmare image is not present at boot, no interface is created.
>>
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 06:49:33AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:16:08AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > >
> > > If the firmare image is not present at boot, no interface is created.
> > > After installing the firmware with fw_update (which succe
Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:16:08AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >
> > If the firmare image is not present at boot, no interface is created.
> > After installing the firmware with fw_update (which succeeds because
> > it looks for "iwm" in dmesg not ifconfig) there is no w
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:16:08AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 01:45:45PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > Try the following.
>
> This diff re-introduces an unrelated problem fixed in r1.7.
>
> Interface attachment is moved back to the attach-hook, and the driver
> trie
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 01:45:45PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Try the following.
This diff re-introduces an unrelated problem fixed in r1.7.
Interface attachment is moved back to the attach-hook, and the driver
tries to load the firmware from disk before creating an interface.
If the firmare
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:20:41PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:59:39AM +0100, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > >> It doesn't change anything.
> > >> As soon as I set an address on the interface (manually or with
> >
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:59:39AM +0100, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >> It doesn't change anything.
> >> As soon as I set an address on the interface (manually or with
> >> dhclient), "mode 11g" is resetted and the errors in the logs are the
>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> It doesn't change anything.
>> As soon as I set an address on the interface (manually or with
>> dhclient), "mode 11g" is resetted and the errors in the logs are the
>> same.
>
> Can you include the output of pcidump -v?
>
> It's possible yo
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:50:11AM +0100, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >> Ok, so I tried reverting one by one every commit. Starting with rev.
> >> 1.33 of if_iwm.c, the interface cannot be brought up (no carrier).
> >> With rev. 1.32, the co
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> Ok, so I tried reverting one by one every commit. Starting with rev.
>> 1.33 of if_iwm.c, the interface cannot be brought up (no carrier).
>> With rev. 1.32, the connection is OK and rather stable.
>>
>> My AP is capable of 802.11a/b/g/n
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:45:16PM +0100, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:31:03PM +0100, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> >> Anyone seeing this?
> >
> > Yes, all the time.
> >
> >> I'll try to find this night the commit whic
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:31:03PM +0100, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
>> Anyone seeing this?
>
> Yes, all the time.
>
>> I'll try to find this night the commit which is
>> causing this regression.
>
> If there was particular commit that made it
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:31:03PM +0100, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> Anyone seeing this?
Yes, all the time.
> I'll try to find this night the commit which is
> causing this regression.
If there was particular commit that made it much worse, that would
be good to know.
But I believe this problem
15 matches
Mail list logo
