Re: inet failover solution

2006-02-07 Thread Steven S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 23:54:21 -0500, Steven S wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> John R. Shannon wrote: On Monday 06 February 2006 06:46, Nickolay A Burkov wrote: > Hi, All! ... > > I don't see any ping commands of the form: > > ping -I fxp0 .. >

Re: inet failover solution

2006-02-06 Thread Rod.. Whitworth
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 23:54:21 -0500, Steven S wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> John R. Shannon wrote: >>> On Monday 06 February 2006 06:46, Nickolay A Burkov wrote: Hi, All! I have a router with two external ethernet links to two different ISPs. Could someone recommend me a g

Re: inet failover solution

2006-02-06 Thread Steven S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > John R. Shannon wrote: >> On Monday 06 February 2006 06:46, Nickolay A Burkov wrote: >>> Hi, All! >>> >>> I have a router with two external ethernet links to two different >>> ISPs. Could someone recommend me a good technique to organize > failover with > these ... >> I

Re: inet failover solution

2006-02-06 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
John R. Shannon wrote: > On Monday 06 February 2006 06:46, Nickolay A Burkov wrote: >> Hi, All! >> >> I have a router with two external ethernet links to two different ISPs. >> Could someone recommend me a good technique to organize failover with these >> two channels (similar to trunk(4) but on hi

Re: inet failover solution

2006-02-06 Thread John R. Shannon
On Monday 06 February 2006 06:46, Nickolay A Burkov wrote: > Hi, All! > > I have a router with two external ethernet links to two different ISPs. > Could someone recommend me a good technique to organize failover with these > two channels (similar to trunk(4) but on higher level)? I thought about >