>> Interesting, thanks for the info - should I post a new bug report as that
one
>> is closed?
>
> If you can repeat it on a -current snapshot, yes please.
I have upgraded to the latest -current snapshot (see dmesg below).
My AP has now been up for 48hrs without interruption, so I can confirm th
On 2010-09-20, Joe Martel wrote:
>>> Interesting, thanks for the info - should I post a new bug report as that
> one
>>> is closed?
>>
>> If you can repeat it on a -current snapshot, yes please.
>
> I'm happy to help by upgrading to a -current snapshot.
>
> Have read FAQ 5 but, when 4.8 is releas
>> Interesting, thanks for the info - should I post a new bug report as that
one
>> is closed?
>
> If you can repeat it on a -current snapshot, yes please.
I'm happy to help by upgrading to a -current snapshot.
Have read FAQ 5 but, when 4.8 is released in November, can I
upgrade from -current to
On 2010-09-18, Joe Martel wrote:
>> Known problem (see PR 5958), no fix known but it may be
>> connected with wireless stations using power-saving mode.
>
> Interesting, thanks for the info - should I post a new bug report as that one
> is closed?
If you can repeat it on a -current snapshot, yes
for wpa+ral, you should definitely run -current or 4.8.
On 2010-09-18, Todd Carson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 01:01:43PM +0100, Joe Martel wrote:
>> > If you do 'ifconfig ral0 down; ifconfig ral0 up' on the hostap
>> > box it might temporarily fix things
>>
>> Yes it does, thanks.
>> Have
> AP side:
> ral0: received assoc_req from xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx rssi 105 mode 11g
> ral0: sending assoc_resp to xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx on channel 6 mode 11g
> ral0: sending msg 1/4 of the 4-way handshake to xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
> last message repeated 2 times
> ral0: station xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx deauthenticate (
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 01:01:43PM +0100, Joe Martel wrote:
> > If you do 'ifconfig ral0 down; ifconfig ral0 up' on the hostap
> > box it might temporarily fix things
>
> Yes it does, thanks.
> Have added a cron job to run this every 24hrs.
I have a similar problem against which ifconfig down; up
> Known problem (see PR 5958), no fix known but it may be
> connected with wireless stations using power-saving mode.
Interesting, thanks for the info - should I post a new bug report as that one
is closed?
Afaik my stations are not using power-saving mode (they all have a power cord,
so I assume
> Known problem (see PR 5958), no fix known but it may be
> connected with wireless stations using power-saving mode.
Interesting, thanks for the info - should I post a new bug report as that one
is closed?
Afaik my stations are not using power-saving mode (they all have a power cord,
so I assume
On 2010-09-17, Joe Martel wrote:
> After 72 hours of excellent running, my station loses wireless connectivity.
Known problem (see PR 5958), no fix known but it may be connected
with wireless stations using power-saving mode.
If you do 'ifconfig ral0 down; ifconfig ral0 up' on the hostap box
it
10 matches
Mail list logo