Re: horizontal scaling of spamd

2005-05-15 Thread Chad M Stewart
Phillip, Thank you for pointing out spamlogd. I never noticed that before and will look into that tomorrow. It looks to be what I might be looking for. Thanks again, Chad

Re: horizontal scaling of spamd

2005-05-15 Thread Phillip Eviston
Hi Chad >What I don't get is how you got spamd to pickup the white listed >entries on both boxes? AFAIK spamd does not look at the logs, simply >puts entries in, does not read them. I must admit I haven't deliberately studied it, but I was going on the contents of man (8) spamlogd which says:

Re: horizontal scaling of spamd

2005-05-15 Thread Chad M Stewart
Hi Phillip, My situation, at this point is hypothetical, though based on reality in carrier grade messaging systems. I have been building and implementing large scale systems for many years, so I have had time thinking small, which can be good and bad. :) I understand your setup, makes perfect

Re: horizontal scaling of spamd

2005-05-14 Thread Phillip Eviston
Hi Chad It sounds as though your situation may be quite different to mine, probably because I sit in a relatively quiet neighborhood of the IPv4 network. My secondary public mailserver (if needed) only feeds mail into the primary public mailserver before passing it off to a very protected Exchange