On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Patrick Mc(avery
wrote:
> I just joined the list 10 days ago or so. Where and when in Toronto will it
> be held?
There may be some confusion about what is meant by "hackathon". Read
http://www.openbsd.org/hackathons.html
for background.
Philip Guenther
Hi Everyone
I just joined the list 10 days ago or so. Where and when in Toronto will
it be held?
My family situation is quite urgent and it's hard to be away from home
for more then 30 minutes but it would be nice to be involved in some
way, I am 30 minutes north of the city.
-Patrick
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:35:12PM -0400, Scott McEachern wrote:
> On 05/29/13 20:22, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> >On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:54:39PM -0400, Scott McEachern wrote:
> >>Have fun, and thanks for the work you're putting in. Just out of
> >>curiosity, what is the focus of this hackat
On 05/29/13 20:22, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:54:39PM -0400, Scott McEachern wrote:
Have fun, and thanks for the work you're putting in. Just out of
curiosity, what is the focus of this hackathon? I don't know what
"t2k13" means.
t == toronto
2k == 2000
13 == 13
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
wrote:
> 13 == 13
To clarify:
13 == rot13(rot13(13))
Philip
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:54:39PM -0400, Scott McEachern wrote:
> As a person who was born and raised in Toronto, and currently lives
> a bit outside of the city, I wanted to extend a warm welcome to our
> OpenBSD hackathon guests!
>
> I hope the major storm that happened last night, which caused
I will donate 100 bucks to the cause.
You call it "network testing", I call it "making sure the Internet is up"
Same thing... Counterstrike tournament... ;^)
Glad to see you guys got in on the ground floor WRT 10G. Betcha M$
don't have the ear of the hardware guys like you do...
Keep up the
> On Mon, 21 May 2007, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> SNIP
> > time for the hackathon. In the meantime, we will try to work with our
> > CX4 units (that is copper 10GE, really weird stuff).
> SNIP
> > At some point we will also need one of the LR optic units as well ;)
>
> now that's an extreme, from CX4
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Theo de Raadt wrote:
SNIP
time for the hackathon. In the meantime, we will try to work with our
CX4 units (that is copper 10GE, really weird stuff).
SNIP
At some point we will also need one of the LR optic units as well ;)
now that's an extreme, from CX4 Cu to LR optics.
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 01:15:58PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote:
> > Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > >A HP XFP SR-optic 10GE module for a HP 3500yl switch which already has
> > >the 10Gb card installed. If anyone can help us with getting this to
> > >us, we'd love it.
> > >
> > >Yes, we know they are very ex
On May 20, 2007, at 5:02 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 01:15:58PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
A HP XFP SR-optic 10GE module for a HP 3500yl switch which
already has
the 10Gb card installed. If anyone can help us with getting this to
us, we'd love it.
Y
On 2007/05/20 17:02, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 01:15:58PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote:
> > Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > >A HP XFP SR-optic 10GE module for a HP 3500yl switch which already has
> > >the 10Gb card installed. If anyone can help us with getting this to
> > >us, we'd love
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 01:15:58PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >A HP XFP SR-optic 10GE module for a HP 3500yl switch which already has
> >the 10Gb card installed. If anyone can help us with getting this to
> >us, we'd love it.
> >
> >Yes, we know they are very expensive. Bruta
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> One very important part of the hackathon sub-project will be to
> improve 10Gb support. Some of us believe that measuring the
> performance of 10Gb networking later will help us spot some
> performance problems that can improve 1Gb ethernet speed.
As a side note, we recentl
Theo de Raadt wrote:
A HP XFP SR-optic 10GE module for a HP 3500yl switch which already has
the 10Gb card installed. If anyone can help us with getting this to
us, we'd love it.
Yes, we know they are very expensive. Brutal, in fact.
Hmm, $2,822.97 at http://keenzo.com/showproduct.asp?id=741395
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
>Yes you're right but a "OpenHTTPD" with "OpenMOD_GZIP" and maybe IPv6 is
>still missing. And maybe a OpenSQUID... :-)))
>Just jokingoO(But httpD improvements would be realy cool. :) )
$ uname -a
OpenBSD jiyu.gnook.org 3.7 GENERIC#97 i386
Doing a $ cvs -qz1 -d [EMAIL
On 2005-05-03, at 2:12 PM, Sean Brown wrote:
be more to your liking? OpenOpenWall perhaps? OpenLinux?
^
Careful. A very vomit worthy company has a trademark on that one...
http://ir.sco.com/ReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=70727
Although, maybe not
On Monday, May 2, Sean Brown wrote:
>
> Is that for the stupid Open* suggestion or the fact it was Bash? Would
> OpenKDE be more to your liking? OpenOpenWall perhaps? OpenLinux?
Uuuggghhh!!!
Ok, I just want to drink beer and hack. The rest will take care
of itself.
--Toby.
> > > I'm looking forward to OpenBash
> >
> > Why do you want every OpenBSD developer to puke?
> >
> > Miod
> Is that for the stupid Open* suggestion or the fact it was Bash?
The latter.
Miod
On May 1, 2005 3:31 pm, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > I'm looking forward to OpenBash
>
> Why do you want every OpenBSD developer to puke?
>
> Miod
Is that for the stupid Open* suggestion or the fact it was Bash? Would OpenKDE
be more to your liking? OpenOpenWall perhaps? OpenLinux?
Steve Shockley wrote:
Sean Brown wrote:
I'm looking forward to OpenBash
If you keep saying things like that, Theo's going to change the default
shell back to csh.
what is this attraction to csh anyway?
cheers,
kim
--
Kim Hawtin : IT Systems Administrator
Ratbag : Level 8 - 63 Pirie Street Adelaide
Sean Brown wrote:
> I'm looking forward to OpenBash
Do you realize that on my only Linux machine I don't even have
bash installed. I replaced /bin/sh with ash and I use zsh for my
shell.
bash for Linux is like Internet Explorer for windows. It comes
preinstalled so everyone uses it and doesn't bo
> Sean Brown wrote:
>>I'm looking forward to OpenBash
>
> They already have it, it's called ksh.
Yes you're right but a "OpenHTTPD" with "OpenMOD_GZIP" and maybe IPv6 is
still missing. And maybe a OpenSQUID... :-)))
Just jokingoO(But httpD improvements would be realy cool. :) )
Kind regards,
Sean Brown wrote:
I'm looking forward to OpenBash
They already have it, it's called ksh.
_
Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft. SmartScreen
Technology.
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=
Thierry Deval wrote:
On May 1, 2005, at 23:31, Miod Vallat wrote:
I'm looking forward to OpenBash
I think they should write the ultimate virus! Take out Windows completely!
Think of it!; it would be the big bang all over again!
Alternately, I could live with mount_smbfs
(puts on flame retardant su
Sean Brown wrote:
I'm looking forward to OpenBash
If you keep saying things like that, Theo's going to change the default
shell back to csh.
On May 1, 2005, at 23:31, Miod Vallat wrote:
I'm looking forward to OpenBash
Why do you want every OpenBSD developer to puke?
Jeez, I didn't read that !
And it is indeed MY feeling. :p
> I'm looking forward to OpenBash
>
Why do you want every OpenBSD developer to puke?
Miod
On May 1, 2005 2:11 pm, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, 1 May 2005, Ben Goren wrote:
> > I did *not* say that I expected a Sendmail replacement any time
> > soon--quite the opposite. Let me put a definite limit on this: I'd bet
> > no more than (a modest) lunch, and only on the condition that I alre
Sorry If I didn't read to well, but when exactly is the hackaton planned?
I always like to have my personal hackaton at the same time and I
always watch every CVS commit.
Wijnand
On Sun, 1 May 2005, Ben Goren wrote:
> I did *not* say that I expected a Sendmail replacement any time
> soon--quite the opposite. Let me put a definite limit on this: I'd bet
> no more than (a modest) lunch, and only on the condition that I already
> happened to be in the same city when the be
On 2005 Apr 30, at 5:22 PM, Jeff Bachtel wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 02:30:28PM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
>> As much as I'm sure Theo would love to get rid of gcc and
>> friends...damn, that's a big undertaking. I don't think it's the sort
>> of thing that would happen at a hackathon. If I had
A few promissing tasks indeed,
What ever endeavours you may embark on during the Hackathon, I hope
you find a nice beer buzz and as Jan Izary put it;
> Beyond that we can hope that someone has
> a moment of clarity and comes up with
> another sweet addition like spamd.
> If I wasn't sure develop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
:) Hah.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:12:39 -0700 Raymond Lillard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dear auto...
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Theo,
>>
>> Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless the
ords fail to express correctly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 9:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hackathon 2005
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless there is some
weird canadian/US translation going on here, I am pretty sure that
the word you were looking for was infact, "uninformed". :)
Oh shit! Theo didn't proof read his e-mail! The two keys are right next to
each other man, no need to bug
Dear auto...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo,
Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless there is some
weird canadian/US translation going on here, I am pretty sure that
the word you were looking for was infact, "uninformed". :)
Nor is there any su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo,
Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless there is some
weird canadian/US translation going on here, I am pretty sure that
the word you were looking for was infact, "uninformed". :)
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:03:01 -0700 Theo de Raadt
<[EMA
> > >> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
> > >> integrate into their tree. We already know that Postfix and qmail don't
>
> > Sorry for not being clear, but I was using it as an example. There are
> > many cases of organizations not accepting patches from the op
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005, Christopher Hylarides wrote:
>> An OpenSMTPd would surprise me, but it doesn't mean that as we write,
>> some
>> OpenBSD developer isn't just about to say "that does it!" with having to
>> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
>> integrate into
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005, Christopher Hylarides wrote:
> >> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
> >> integrate into their tree. We already know that Postfix and qmail don't
> Sorry for not being clear, but I was using it as an example. There are
> many cases of organ
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005, Christopher Hylarides wrote:
> An OpenSMTPd would surprise me, but it doesn't mean that as we write, some
> OpenBSD developer isn't just about to say "that does it!" with having to
> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
> integrate into their tr
> While I'm not a developer, I do beleive it scales reasonably well writing
> their own implementations.
Scaling isn't really our concern; I barely know what the word means.
There is one group of people who we do know scales.
Whiners. They scale really well.
> I don't have any point to make on the value of these
> projects, however "does this scale?"
How does it scale that we have to listen to your ininformed
gibberish day in day out?
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 02:30:28PM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
> BTW, I just checked out the OpenCVS page. You know, it used to be that
> people would join a project and commit fixes or enhancements, rather
> than fork first and ask questions later. Is this really the best use
> of developer resource
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:22:48 -0500
Jeff Bachtel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I just checked out the OpenCVS page. You know, it used to be that
> people would join a project and commit fixes or enhancements, rather
> than fork first and ask questions later. Is this really the best use
> of deve
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 02:30:28PM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
> As much as I'm sure Theo would love to get rid of gcc and
> friends...damn, that's a big undertaking. I don't think it's the sort
> of thing that would happen at a hackathon. If I had to guess, it'd be
> made the main point of some fut
47 matches
Mail list logo
