Re: greyscanner - sender with no MX or A

2012-12-28 Thread john slee
On 27 December 2012 23:59, Marc Espie wrote: > I would be careful with that guy's work... you may suddenly find yourself > in the bathroom with a backed up toilet gargling shitz out. I wouldn't use language quite that strong, not knowing anything about Bob, but it looks like he didn't read 'per

Re: greyscanner - sender with no MX or A

2012-12-27 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:17:59PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 schrieb Peter Hessler : > > > Not sure where you got "greyscanner" from, but you should probably ask > > the authors. > > > > > It's from a guy called Bob. > > http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/sc

Re: greyscanner - sender with no MX or A

2012-12-27 Thread Reyk Floeter
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 schrieb Peter Hessler : > Not sure where you got "greyscanner" from, but you should probably ask > the authors. > > It's from a guy called Bob. http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/scripts/greyscanner > > On 2012 Dec 26 (Wed) at 21:31:26 +0100 (+0100), Jan Star

Re: greyscanner - sender with no MX or A

2012-12-27 Thread Peter Hessler
Not sure where you got "greyscanner" from, but you should probably ask the authors. On 2012 Dec 26 (Wed) at 21:31:26 +0100 (+0100), Jan Stary wrote: :This is spamd and greyscanner on current/macppc. :Generally, it works very well for me. : :Recently, I see greyscanner trapping hosts that try to :

Re: greyscanner - sender with no MX or A

2012-12-26 Thread Jan Stary
On Dec 26 21:31:26, h...@stare.cz wrote: > This is spamd and greyscanner on current/macppc. > Generally, it works very well for me. > > Recently, I see greyscanner trapping hosts that try to > "mail from sender with no MX or A", such as > > Dec 26 17:21:13 www greyscanner[31861]: Trapped 87.219.1