Hi,
On Fri, 02.09.2005 at 00:26:36 +0200, Markus Wernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] I am also a bit undecided about the usefulness
> | of such devices.
> Erm ... wasn't it you to suggest "that the control channel could
> be used to break end-to-end encryption into two pieces, originating or
On 9/1/05, Simon Farnsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's only two ways to get FTP+SSL past a firewall that would otherwise
> filter it:
>
> 1) Drop firewalling for a range of ports used for FTP+SSL connections. For
> example, open 65000-65535 for incoming, and configure your endpoints to l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toni Mueller wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On Thu, 01.09.2005 at 19:29:57 +0200, Markus Wernig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|>Squid is different. Usually, it doesn't do SSL itself, but just passes
|>the connection on.
| it does, however, talk SSL to the outside s
On Thursday 01 September 2005 22:51, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 01.09.2005 at 19:29:57 +0200, Markus Wernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Squid is different. Usually, it doesn't do SSL itself, but just passes
> > the connection on.
>
> it does, however, talk SSL to the outside server.
>
Hi,
On Thu, 01.09.2005 at 19:29:57 +0200, Markus Wernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Squid is different. Usually, it doesn't do SSL itself, but just passes
> the connection on.
it does, however, talk SSL to the outside server.
> You might be able to code around that by terminating two distinct
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toni Mueller wrote:
| I can't see why this must be so. HTTPS can be proxied with Squid which
| "somehow" handles the crypto stuff after reading the client's "CONNECT
| ...", and digging into FTP+SSL suggests that the control channel could
| be used t
From: Toni Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > moreover, when you think about it, ftp w/TLS encrypts the control
> > channel, it's the entire point that 3rd parties (like
> ftp-proxy) can't
> > see or modify what's gpoing on, so this cannot possibly work.
>
> I can't see why this must be so.
Hi,
On Fri, 19.08.2005 at 12:41:20 +0200, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ftp-proxy does not support TLS.
ok.
> moreover, when you think about it, ftp w/TLS encrypts the control
> channel, it's the entire point that 3rd parties (like ftp-proxy) can't
> see or modify what's gpoing o
* Marc Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-19 12:29]:
> when i try to ftp everything is working fine. but when i try to connect
> to a host, which is running proftpd with TLS activated, ftp-proxy cuts
> off when TLS begins to work
ftp-proxy does not support TLS.
moreover, when you think about i
9 matches
Mail list logo
