Re: fd.o HAL support / OpenBSD alternative for NetworkManager

2007-02-11 Thread Lars Hansson
Bret Lambert wrote: Just a thought, but it may have something to do with this: Probably not.It's not like there isn't any GPL'd software in ports. The main reason for the lack of HAL on OpenBSD is that it is a LOT of work to port and integrate and apparently no-one has had the time or interes

Re: fd.o HAL support / OpenBSD alternative for NetworkManager

2007-02-09 Thread Bret Lambert
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 17:39 +0200, Stefan Parviainen wrote: > Is there any work going on to get support for the freedesktop.org HAL > specification (http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fhal)? It seems that > there are quite a few programs that would benefit from this. Is there a > technical

Re: fd.o HAL support / OpenBSD alternative for NetworkManager

2007-02-09 Thread Marco Peereboom
There is no way in hell that this type of garbage will EVER make it in OpenBSD. Unlike Linux, OpenBSD *is* free. On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:39:46PM +0200, Stefan Parviainen wrote: > Is there any work going on to get support for the freedesktop.org HAL > specification (http://wiki.freedesktop.org/

Re: fd.o HAL support / OpenBSD alternative for NetworkManager

2007-02-09 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:39:46PM +0200, Stefan Parviainen wrote: > Is there any work going on to get support for the freedesktop.org HAL > specification (http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fhal)? It seems that Speaking only for myself, freedesktop.org HAL is a horrible, nasty thing. They