I wrote:
> [...] Why should
> be difficult to track the indices in yytext of the beginning and the end
> of each matching subexpression, in two arrays of integers (one for
> the beginning and one for the end)? [...]
More exactly: in the first array the index of the first element of
the matching
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Refering to subpatterns is not available in flex. I suppose it is not
> available since it would require a more complex re engine.
> Interpretation of the lexical value should be "hand-crafted".
I also though caomplexity can be the reason, but I have doubts. Why should
b
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:49:44PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
> Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > Tradiotionally, { } pattersn are not part of awk re's.
> >
> > Posix added them, but we do not include them afaik. Gnu awk only accepts
> > them if given an extra arg (--posix or --re-interval).
> >
>
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Tradiotionally, { } pattersn are not part of awk re's.
>
> Posix added them, but we do not include them afaik. Gnu awk only accepts
> them if given an extra arg (--posix or --re-interval).
>
> I think this should be documented.
Although there is a clear theory about "regul
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:08:47AM -0500, cwl...@mst.edu wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> I'm running a 5.7 release, and I'm wondering if anyone can confirm
> an awk bug I found.
>
> Curly brackets are treated as literal characters instead of bounds
> as specified by re_format(7).
>
> Reproduction:
>
> e
5 matches
Mail list logo
