On Fri, 04 May 2007 06:10:46 -0700, Clint Pachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Dixon wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 23:18:38 -0700, Clint Pachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>>> Axton wrote:
>>>
On 5/2/07, Matiss Miglans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> Scenario 1 will be ri
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Thu, 03 May 2007 23:18:38 -0700, Clint Pachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Axton wrote:
On 5/2/07, Matiss Miglans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Scenario 1 will be right.
Don't mix there "normal" ethernet with vlan's.
Jonathan Whiteman wrote:
Lets sa
On Thu, 03 May 2007 23:18:38 -0700, Clint Pachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Axton wrote:
>> On 5/2/07, Matiss Miglans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> Scenario 1 will be right.
>>> Don't mix there "normal" ethernet with vlan's.
>>>
>>> Jonathan Whiteman wrote:
>>> > Lets say I'm setting up vl
Axton wrote:
On 5/2/07, Matiss Miglans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Scenario 1 will be right.
Don't mix there "normal" ethernet with vlan's.
Jonathan Whiteman wrote:
> Lets say I'm setting up vlan devices so that 4 completely separate
> subnets' gateways can share same ethernet port on the rou
On 5/2/07, Matiss Miglans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Scenario 1 will be right.
Don't mix there "normal" ethernet with vlan's.
Jonathan Whiteman wrote:
> Lets say I'm setting up vlan devices so that 4 completely separate
> subnets' gateways can share same ethernet port on the router. Is it
>
Hi
Scenario 1 will be right.
Don't mix there "normal" ethernet with vlan's.
Jonathan Whiteman wrote:
Lets say I'm setting up vlan devices so that 4 completely separate
subnets' gateways can share same ethernet port on the router. Is it
more appropriate to give the physical device itself an ip
6 matches
Mail list logo