Hummm maybe I misunderstand but that look more like a proxy no?
FranC'ois Rousseau
On 10/15/07, CC)dric THIBAULT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firstly, thanks for your comments,
>
> 2007/10/12, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I don't fully understand your email, because some of your sentences
Firstly, thanks for your comments,
2007/10/12, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I don't fully understand your email, because some of your sentences
> aren't really gramatically correct, and some of them don't seem to me
> to be "technologically correct" (ie. the technology questions in them
> don't
On 10/10/2007, Cidric THIBAULT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank's for your comment. Unfortunately, i well understand the Nat
> process.
Huh? If you understand NAT very well, then how is that unfortunate?
I'm not trying to be a prick here; I honestly have trouble
understanding you.
> I's right i
Cidric THIBAULT wrote:
I'm searching a way to enable a transparent firewall (without ip adress),
probably in bridge mode.., with a capability of NAT. I know the interest is
not evident to nat some computers on the same IP lan, but it's for a client,
so!
You want to have a bridge that does N
You _may_ be able to apply the following setup (borrowing from
someone else's design :-) :
inside box (1)> firewall/bridge doing nat (2)-> default
gateway> internet
if1 if2
Let's just suppose that if2 has the ip address IP2 c
2007/10/10, stuart van Zee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > From:
> >
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I work on BSD 4.1, with i386 hardware.
> >
> > I'm searching a way to enable a transparent firewall (without ip
> adress),
> > probably in bridge mode.., with a capability of NAT. I know the
> > interest is
> From: Cedric THIBAULT
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I work on BSD 4.1, with i386 hardware.
>
> I'm searching a way to enable a transparent firewall (without ip adress),
> probably in bridge mode.., with a capability of NAT. I know the
> interest is
> not evident to nat some computers on the same I
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Cidric THIBAULT wrote:
> I'm searching a way to enable a transparent firewall (without ip adress),
> probably in bridge mode.., with a capability of NAT. I know the interest is
Hum... bridge and NAT aren't working at the same level. I think you'd
need to set an @ip address an
8 matches
Mail list logo
