un out at 100% than at 95%.
Of course this requires that root runs out at something over 100%.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of
Matthew S Elmore
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Stra
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Matthew S Elmore
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Strange df output
It was my understanding that this reserved space was not accounted for
when using 'df'. Henc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>> 490*0.05
24.5
>>> 490-24.5-32.8
432.69
Math looks to be spot on with a reserved 5%.
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:48:21 -0700 Matthew S Elmore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It was my understanding that this reserved space was not accounted
>fo
It was my understanding that this reserved space was not accounted for
when using 'df'. Hence, you can sometimes have partitions that are 105%
capacity.
Am I off base on this? It is very possible, it is very late. ;)
From the FAQ sec 14.14:
People are sometimes surprised to find they have neg
Matthew S Elmore wrote:
> Can anyone explain this math to me?
>
> 490M - 32.8M != 433M
>
> Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of space went.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/matt$ df -h
> FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/wd0a 4
Whichever definition the 'df -h' command is using. I'm assuming it's
consistent in its use itself. ;)
On Jun 25, 2005, at 11:45 PM, Chris wrote:
Matthew S Elmore wrote:
Can anyone explain this math to me?
490M - 32.8M != 433M
Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of spa
5% or so is reserved for root and is not "available".
When everybody has run out of disk space, it is very helpful
if the situation does NOT apply to root.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Matthew S Elmore
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:35
7 matches
Mail list logo