On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 01:18:16AM +0100, Craig Skinner wrote:
> Hi lads,
>
> See any probs with this wee idea to auto generate the above?
>
> Hey Craig,
> Saw your post to openbsd-misc on MARC;
>
> Is there any particular reason you don't use the SPF records that
gmail
> publish? I added the f
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:41:56AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
>
> I have the following gmail servers whitelisted in my /etc/whitelist
>
> #gmail
> 64.233.162.192/28 # zproxy gmail
> 64.233.170.192/28 # rproxy gmail
> 64.233.182.192/28 # nproxy gmail
> 64.233.184.192/28 # wproxy gmail
> 66.24
Jeff Ross wrote:
Never had any trouble with gmail once the various servers were
whitelisted. Are you putting your whitelist after Bob Beck's list in
spamd.conf? After your own blacklist?
From my spamd.conf
all:\
:china:korea:blacklist:beck:whitelist
Not that it's likely to have any bear
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/04/07 14:55, Jeff Ross wrote:
rdr pass on $if_ext proto tcp from to port smtp \
-> ($if_ext) port 25
Have you tested that your whitelist works by connecting from an IP
address that's listed on it?
No, but until this last week or so I've
On 2006/04/07 14:55, Jeff Ross wrote:
> >>rdr pass on $if_ext proto tcp from to port smtp \
> >> -> ($if_ext) port 25
> >
> >Have you tested that your whitelist works by connecting from an IP
> >address that's listed on it?
>
> No, but until this last week or so I've never had reason to think I
Okay, I've had some good ideas and thing to check. In the meantime, I've
had a chance to run tcpdump on port 25 while an aol e-mail was being
bounced.
Here's the relevant part of the capture:
11:42:56.537510 imo-m16.mx.aol.com.smtp > heinlein.openvistas.net.2047: P
1:100(99) ack 1 win 32768
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 02:41:17PM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Darrin Chandler wrote:
>
> >Jeff Ross wrote:
> >
> >> Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:
> >>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> Message will be retried for 1 more day(s)
> >>
> >> Technical deta
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Jeff Ross wrote:
> Is it possible you're hitting spamd's max connection limit?
I don't think so. This is a moderately busy e-mail server, and 800
connections seems like a lot. Is there a tool out there I don't know
about that can figure out the
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/04/07 10:49, Jeff Ross wrote:
rdr pass on $if_ext proto tcp from to port smtp \
-> ($if_ext) port 25
Have you tested that your whitelist works by connecting from an IP
address that's listed on it?
No, but until this last week or so I've
Jeff Ross wrote:
Is it possible you're hitting spamd's max connection limit?
I don't think so. This is a moderately busy e-mail server, and 800
connections seems like a lot. Is there a tool out there I don't know
about that can figure out the number of active connections?
It's probably
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Jeff Ross wrote:
Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message will be retried for 1 more day(s)
Technical details of temporary failure:
TEMP_FAILURE: Could not initiate SMTP conversation with any hosts:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, David Hill wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:49:06AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, David Hill wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:41:56AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
Hi all,
I've had several users reporting that mail to them from gmail and aol
accounts has been
On 2006/04/07 10:49, Jeff Ross wrote:
> rdr pass on $if_ext proto tcp from to port smtp \
> -> ($if_ext) port 25
Have you tested that your whitelist works by connecting from an IP
address that's listed on it?
I usually use "no rdr" when I want to exempt servers from
greylisting, istr having so
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:49:06AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, David Hill wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:41:56AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>I've had several users reporting that mail to them from gmail and aol
> >>accounts has been bouncing. I fin
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, David Hill wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:41:56AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
Hi all,
I've had several users reporting that mail to them from gmail and aol
accounts has been bouncing. I finally got my hands on the bounce
messages from one of the gmail messages. Two were De
Jeff Ross wrote:
Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message will be retried for 1 more day(s)
Technical details of temporary failure:
TEMP_FAILURE: Could not initiate SMTP conversation with any hosts:
[ a.mx.openvistas.net. (0): Connection dropped]
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:41:56AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've had several users reporting that mail to them from gmail and aol
> accounts has been bouncing. I finally got my hands on the bounce
> messages from one of the gmail messages. Two were Delivery Status
> Notifications
17 matches
Mail list logo
