Richard P. Koett wrote:
> I guess it was a stupid autonegotiation problem after all. I didn't
> know that could affect traffic in only 1 direction. Live and learn :)
FWIW, if you're not autonegotiating, you should make certain both sides
(NIC and switch) are hard coded/not set to negotiate.
On Saturday 14 October 2006 4:10 am, you wrote:
Hi Richard
I dealt with an ISP on behalf of a client that required a MSS of 1100 during
one particular phase of troubleshooting. Funny thing (not) they forgot to
notify everyone when said problem was corrected and the client ran with that
MSS for
On 2006/10/14 02:42, Richard P. Koett wrote:
> >> I won't post a dmesg unless requested because I think this platform
> >> is pretty well known.
it probably won't make a difference here, but in general, the dmesg
doesn't just tell about the platform, it tells about the OS you're using
on it too.
A huge thank you to all who offered advice on my network problem. It
appears that the problem has been fixed by changing hostname.sis0
from "dhcp NONE NONE NONE" to "dhcp media 10baseT".
Previous output from ifconfig showed:
sis0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX fu
Good morning
> I tried the following variations:
>
> scrub out on sis0 max-mss 1440
> scrub out max-mss 1440
> scrub max-mss 1440
> scrub max-mss 1400
You should be able to figure out the problem,
actually. Good ole tcpdump should show you something.
I'd specifically look for icmp that you mig
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/10/14 00:56, Richard P. Koett wrote:
>> known. Hosts on the internal network are able to access the Internet
>> but report that access seems slow. Some operations fail consistently.
>> For example, users can send and receive e-mail e-mails but can't send
>> e-mail
Adriaan wrote:
> On 10/14/06, Richard P. Koett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm having throughput problems using a Soekris net4801 as a firewall
>> running OpenBSD 3.9. This is replacing a SonicWALL device that was
>> working fine from the user's perspective. (I want to replace it
>> because, amon
Matthew Closson wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Richard P. Koett wrote:
>
>> I'm having throughput problems using a Soekris net4801 as a firewall
>> running OpenBSD 3.9. This is replacing a SonicWALL device that was
>> working fine from the user's perspective. (I want to replace it
>> because, among
On 2006/10/14 00:56, Richard P. Koett wrote:
> known. Hosts on the internal network are able to access the Internet
> but report that access seems slow. Some operations fail consistently.
> For example, users can send and receive e-mail e-mails but can't send
> e-mail with attachments larger than a
On 10/14/06, Richard P. Koett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm having throughput problems using a Soekris net4801 as a firewall
running OpenBSD 3.9. This is replacing a SonicWALL device that was
working fine from the user's perspective. (I want to replace it because,
among other things, I abhor Son
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Richard P. Koett wrote:
I'm having throughput problems using a Soekris net4801 as a firewall
running OpenBSD 3.9. This is replacing a SonicWALL device that was
working fine from the user's perspective. (I want to replace it because,
among other things, I abhor SonicWALL's li
11 matches
Mail list logo
