On Wed, 12 May 2010 09:09:18 +0200 (CEST)
Jens Teglhus MC8ller wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 04:46, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> > On 5/11/10 8:05 PM, Keith wrote:
> >> Hi. is it possible to get multiple http relayd relays listening on
> >> localhost each with a different port # and each with a differ
On 05/12/10 04:53, Keith wrote:
Were doing the above and have relayd listening in 127.0.0.1 port 8080
and have pf rdr rules redirecting https traffic to 127.0.0.1:8080 and
the certificate that the https relay is using is called 127.0.0.1.crt
This works fine but what if we want to host another ss
I've been following the tutorials from https://https://calomel.org
I am using a modified version of their pf.conf that can be found at
https://calomel.org/pf_config.html and the relayd tutorial that can be
found at https://calomel.org/relayd.html
The following is an extract from their pf tut
On Wed, May 12, 2010 04:46, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> On 5/11/10 8:05 PM, Keith wrote:
>> Hi. is it possible to get multiple http relayd relays listening on
>> localhost each with a different port # and each with a different ssl
>> certificate ?
>
> SSL certificate are host name bound, not port bound
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Keith wrote:
> Hi. is it possible to get multiple http relayd relays listening on
localhost
> each with a different port # and each with a different ssl certificate ?
>
> I've followed a tutorial I found on the net about setting up a firewall up
> so that no servic
On 5/11/10 8:05 PM, Keith wrote:
Hi. is it possible to get multiple http relayd relays listening on
localhost each with a different port # and each with a different ssl
certificate ?
SSL certificate are host name bound, not port bound isn't it?
So, I would say no, but I could be wrong.
6 matches
Mail list logo