Dave Feustel wrote:
I got my 3.9 Cdrom set yesterday and today started installing
it on an external usb disk so as not to wipe out my existing
3.8 setup. When I got to the disk partition, I erased the existing
'a' partition (dos) and created a new bsd 'a' partition. The partition
had a default of
On Sunday 09 April 2006 18:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I do not believe an existing 'a' partition (dos).
> I do believe an existing dos partition,
> which is something very different from an OpenBSD 'a' partition.
I now have installed 3.9 on my external usb drive.
There is a bug in the instal
Dave Feustel wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday 09 April 2006 16:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Something is very confused.
> > I do not believe an existing 'a' partition (dos).
>
> I bought the disk at Best Buy and copied a few files from
> /home/daf to test the disk. The files were copied to the
> usb-
On Sunday 09 April 2006 16:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Something is very confused.
> I do not believe an existing 'a' partition (dos).
I bought the disk at Best Buy and copied a few files from
/home/daf to test the disk. The files were copied to the
usb-connected disk and stored in the fat fil
Dave Feustel wrote:
>
>
> I got my 3.9 Cdrom set yesterday and today started installing
> it on an external usb disk so as not to wipe out my existing
> 3.8 setup. When I got to the disk partition, I erased the existing
> 'a' partition (dos) and created a new bsd 'a' partition. The partition
> ha
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 01:58:32PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> I got my 3.9 Cdrom set yesterday and today started installing
> it on an external usb disk so as not to wipe out my existing
> 3.8 setup. When I got to the disk partition, I erased the existing
> 'a' partition (dos) and created a new b
6 matches
Mail list logo
