Re: Post-quantum cryptography

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 08:13:10PM +0200, Mirco Richter wrote: > AES-256 is considered to be a pqcrypto-hard system. You also need key negotation, a mode of operation, and a MAC function to tie it all together. Cryptography is a very complicated field. You know, a lotta ins, lotta outs, lotta w

Re: Post-quantum cryptography

2013/8/10 Mirco Richter : > say, that from the OBSD POV, the project wants to wait until someone else > implements such a cypher and has proofen, that the implementation is > practically as secure as the mathematical model already predicts ? Yes. Now show us your cypher or go away.

Re: Post-quantum cryptography

> Gesendet: Samstag, 10. August 2013 um 19:11 Uhr > Von: Nicolai > An: misc@openbsd.org > Betreff: Re: Post-quantum cryptography > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Mirco Richter wrote: > > Can you please point me to where this is related to OBSD? > > I t

Re: Post-quantum cryptography

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Mirco Richter wrote: > Can you please point me to where this is related to OBSD? I think your question as intended was, is the OpenBSD project working on pqcrypto. The answer is no: The OpenBSD project does not invent new primitives; it only implements th

Re: Post-quantum cryptography

> Gesendet: Samstag, 10. August 2013 um 13:18 Uhr > Von: "Christian Weisgerber" > An: misc@openbsd.org > Betreff: Re: Post-quantum cryptography > > Mirco Richter wrote: > > > one may think, if it's time to implement a post quantum asymetric key > &

Re: Post-quantum cryptography

Mirco Richter wrote: > one may think, if it's time to implement a post quantum asymetric key > cryptographic system. > > Are there any attemptes to do this? Are there discussions which of the > mathematical possible > systems are best in practice and so forth? Are there even implementations, >