Re: Ports Question

On Nov 27, 2007 9:56 PM, Manpreet Nehra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i am using the 4.2 release and that's why wondering if the ports tree > is a little outdated, since alot of stuff has changed over from > september 1 to Novemeber 1 when 4.2 actually released. Arent the > release base and ports i

Re: Ports Question

On 11/27/07, Manpreet Nehra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i am using the 4.2 release and that's why wondering if the ports tree > is a little outdated, since alot of stuff has changed over from > september 1 to Novemeber 1 when 4.2 actually released. Arent the > release base and ports in sync? it'

Re: Ports Question

--- Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/27/07, Manpreet Nehra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i am using the 4.2 release and that's why wondering if the ports > tree > > is a little outdated, since alot of stuff has changed over from > > september 1 to Novemeber 1 when 4.2 actually rele

Re: Ports Question

i am using the 4.2 release and that's why wondering if the ports tree is a little outdated, since alot of stuff has changed over from september 1 to Novemeber 1 when 4.2 actually released. Arent the release base and ports in sync? On Nov 27, 2007 7:59 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: Ports Question

On 2007/11/27 08:53, Juan Miscaro wrote: > --- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2007/11/27 08:08, Juan Miscaro wrote: > > > --- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 2007/11/27 13:55, Manpreet Nehra wrote: > > > > > I have been compiling the ports and so

Re: Ports Question

--- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007/11/27 08:08, Juan Miscaro wrote: > > --- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 2007/11/27 13:55, Manpreet Nehra wrote: > > > > I have been compiling the ports and some of the ports fail > flat. On > > > > checking the ft

Re: Ports Question

On 2007/11/27 08:08, Juan Miscaro wrote: > --- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2007/11/27 13:55, Manpreet Nehra wrote: > > > I have been compiling the ports and some of the ports fail flat. On > > > checking the ftp.openbsd.org, I found the ports.tar.gz was created > > on > >

Re: Ports Question

--- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007/11/27 13:55, Manpreet Nehra wrote: > > I have been compiling the ports and some of the ports fail flat. On > > checking the ftp.openbsd.org, I found the ports.tar.gz was created > on > > Sep 1. Will there be a newer ports file > > ftp> ls

Re: Ports Question

On 2007/11/27 13:55, Manpreet Nehra wrote: > I have been compiling the ports and some of the ports fail flat. On > checking the ftp.openbsd.org, I found the ports.tar.gz was created on > Sep 1. Will there be a newer ports file ftp> ls /pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/ports.tar.gz 227 Entering Passive Mode (

Re: Ports Question

On Nov 27, 2007 1:55 PM, Manpreet Nehra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been compiling the ports and some of the ports fail flat. On > checking the ftp.openbsd.org, I found the ports.tar.gz was created on > Sep 1. Will there be a newer ports file, since a lot ports dont > compile some because o

Re: ports question

PKG_INFO(1)OpenBSD Reference Manual NAME pkg_info - a utility for displaying information on software packages [...] -D Show the install-message file (if any) for each package (depre- cated option). -M Show the install-message file (if any

Re: ports question

On 10/11/06, Matthew Weigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bryan Irvine wrote: > Sometimes these get installed as a dependency of another app though > and so the screen just keeps right on trucking and you don't have time > to read it. Is there some command or somewhere you can go to see what > the

Re: ports question

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:28:08PM -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote: > Sometimes these get installed as a dependency of another app > though and so the screen just keeps right on trucking and you > don't have time to read it. Is there some command or somewhere > you can go to see what the message was?

Re: ports question

Bryan Irvine wrote: > Sometimes these get installed as a dependency of another app though > and so the screen just keeps right on trucking and you don't have time > to read it. Is there some command or somewhere you can go to see what > the message was? $ man pkg_info The argument you're lookin

Re: Ports question

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 03:12:33AM +0100, the unit calling itself Stuart Henderson wrote: > --On 29 September 2005 20:36 -0500, J Moore wrote: > > >Can someone tell me if and when the clamav in the -stable tree is > >going to have the security flaw patched? > > On Wednesday just gone. >

Re: Ports question

On 9/29/05, Chad M Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While not at all supported and could break things I have done in the > past > > > ## CLAMAV on OpenBSD > cd /usr > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs cvs get \ > -rHEAD -Pports/security/clamav > > then go make a package and assuming that works, install

Re: Ports question

While not at all supported and could break things I have done in the past ## CLAMAV on OpenBSD cd /usr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs cvs get \ -rHEAD -Pports/security/clamav then go make a package and assuming that works, install it. YMMV and use at your own risk or demise. :) I did it this wee

Re: Ports question

--On 29 September 2005 20:36 -0500, J Moore wrote: Can someone tell me if and when the clamav in the -stable tree is going to have the security flaw patched? On Wednesday just gone.

Re: Ports Question - Update

On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 05:03:34AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > I tried using "pkg_add -r unzip...". That didn't work, but I think the > reason is that both the new and the old had the same version number > (5.51). This is 3.7 behavior, newer pkg_add will update if something useful actually chang

Re: Ports Question - Update

On Tuesday 16 August 2005 03:41, Uwe Dippel wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:22:15 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > > > So I attempted to pkg_delete unzip and then got the following: > > === > > /usr/ports}cd archivers/unzip > > /usr/ports/archivers/unzip}sudo pkg_delete unzip > > Password

Re: Ports Question - Update

* Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-16 10:53]: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:22:15 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > > > So I attempted to pkg_delete unzip and then got the following: > > === > > /usr/ports}cd archivers/unzip > > /usr/ports/archivers/unzip}sudo pkg_delete unzip > > Passwo

Re: Ports Question - Update

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:22:15 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > So I attempted to pkg_delete unzip and then got the following: > === > /usr/ports}cd archivers/unzip > /usr/ports/archivers/unzip}sudo pkg_delete unzip > Password: > Can't remove unzip without also removing: > xmms-1.2.10p0 kde

Re: Ports Question

On 8/14/05, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm running release 3.7 and I've put the release src and ports > trees in /usr. I've updated both trees using cvs. > > I remade unzip as per the instructions in ports.html. > When I attempted to make install, I got an error message > saying tha

Re: Ports Question

On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 01:51:02PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > I'm running release 3.7 and I've put the release src and ports > trees in /usr. I've updated both trees using cvs. > > I remade unzip as per the instructions in ports.html. > When I attempted to make install, I got an error message >

Re: Ports Question

On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 01:51:02PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > I'm running release 3.7 and I've put the release src and ports > trees in /usr. I've updated both trees using cvs. > > I remade unzip as per the instructions in ports.html. > When I attempted to make install, I got an error message >