On 2017-09-09, Lukasz Jendrysik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since the main goal of OpenBSD is security, I keep wondering about one
> thing.
> There are packages like irssi or Thunderbird that should be updated to
> the newest upstream version.
> For example irssi's upstream encourages all users to upgra
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 21:16:36 +0200, Lukasz Jendrysik
wrote:
> Similar situation with Chromium etc. All of those packages exists in
> newer versions in -current, but it's not an option in my case.
>
> I understand that -stable is not place for the latest packages
> available and it's expected to
On 09/09/2017 22:23, Theo de Raadt wrote:
For example irssi's upstream encourages all users to upgrade to the
newest one, see:
https://irssi.org/2017/07/07/irssi-1.0.4-released/
Similar situation with Chromium etc. All of those packages exists in
newer versions in -current, but it's not an opti
> >> I understand that -stable is not place for the latest packages available
> >> and it's expected to be rock solid, but also secure.
> The thing is that mentioned packages are already updated in MAIN.
Twice the work == twice the work.
> I'm curious how looks the process of merging package upda
> Since the main goal of OpenBSD is security, I keep wondering about one
> thing.
> There are packages like irssi or Thunderbird that should be updated to
> the newest upstream version.
These two sentences don't make sense together. You equate "update
update" with security.
That doesn't make s
5 matches
Mail list logo
