Kian Mohageri escreveu:
>> Wouldn't this do the trick?
>>
>> rdr on rl1 proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.121 port 80 -> 192.168.1.103
>>
>> "Redirect any port 80 traffic originally meant for me to 192.168.1.103"
>>
>
>
>
> Yes, but why are you asking if you already have the answer? As stated i
> Wouldn't this do the trick?
>
> rdr on rl1 proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.121 port 80 -> 192.168.1.103
>
> "Redirect any port 80 traffic originally meant for me to 192.168.1.103"
Yes, but why are you asking if you already have the answer? As stated in
the man page, your traffic will also nee
Peter Blair escreveu:
> man pf.conf
>
> Secondly, it's been discussed numerous times on the list that bridges
> have their place (I use them in production environments at our data
> centre) but you'll find filtering a bridge much more difficult than
> filtering a NAT.
>
> On 7/29/06, elaconta.com W
man pf.conf
Secondly, it's been discussed numerous times on the list that bridges
have their place (I use them in production environments at our data
centre) but you'll find filtering a bridge much more difficult than
filtering a NAT.
On 7/29/06, elaconta.com Webmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4 matches
Mail list logo
