Re: Ospfd default route query

2020-04-27 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 07:26:08PM +0100, Richard Chivers wrote: > Hi, > > That makes a lot of sense thanks, and appears to have solved the problem, > we had a route added through our loopback interface in production" > "!/sbin/route add -reject default 127.0.0.1" > > Is that the best/general pra

Re: Ospfd default route query

2020-04-27 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Richard Chivers(r.chiv...@zengenti.com) on 2020.04.27 19:26:08 +0100: > Hi, > > That makes a lot of sense thanks, and appears to have solved the problem, > we had a route added through our loopback interface in production" > "!/sbin/route add -reject default 127.0.0.1" > > Is that the best/genera

Re: Ospfd default route query

2020-04-27 Thread Richard Chivers
Hi, That makes a lot of sense thanks, and appears to have solved the problem, we had a route added through our loopback interface in production" "!/sbin/route add -reject default 127.0.0.1" Is that the best/general practise in general? Cheers Richard On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 8:25 AM Claudio Jek

Re: Ospfd default route query

2020-04-27 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Richard Chivers wrote: > Not sure how I missed the clear information in the man page... > > "If set to default, a default route pointing to this router will be > announced over OSPF" > > It seems I am just having an issue and it should work as I expected.

Re: Ospfd default route query

2020-04-26 Thread Richard Chivers
Not sure how I missed the clear information in the man page... "If set to default, a default route pointing to this router will be announced over OSPF" It seems I am just having an issue and it should work as I expected. I will do some more diagnosis in the morning... On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, 17: