From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Trunk(4) provides link redundancy. Say you had a NIC on a
> box cabled
> > into a switch. That switch port dies, your box falls off
> the network.
> > Introduce trunk, now you have two NICs in your box, cabled to two
> > switch ports. One
Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Pushor wrote:
Steve Glaus wrote:
Ok, I gotcha, trunk just looked like a ready mad solution
for what I
was trying to do... Could you tell me WHY it's not able to be used
for that a
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tim Pushor wrote:
> > Steve Glaus wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, I gotcha, trunk just looked like a ready mad solution
> for what I
> >> was trying to do... Could you tell me WHY it's not able to be used
> >> for that and what it is for?
> >> I've gone
Steve Glaus wrote:
Tim Pushor wrote:
Steve Glaus wrote:
Ok, I gotcha, trunk just looked like a ready mad solution for what
I was trying to do... Could you tell me WHY it's not able to be used
for that and what it is for?
I've gone the pf route before to but it seems to add a lot of
complex
Tim Pushor wrote:
Steve Glaus wrote:
Ok, I gotcha, trunk just looked like a ready mad solution for what I
was trying to do... Could you tell me WHY it's not able to be used
for that and what it is for?
I've gone the pf route before to but it seems to add a lot of
complexity to my ruleset
Steve Glaus wrote:
Ok, I gotcha, trunk just looked like a ready mad solution for what I
was trying to do... Could you tell me WHY it's not able to be used for
that and what it is for?
I've gone the pf route before to but it seems to add a lot of
complexity to my ruleset
trunk(4) is mainly
that's not what trunk(4) is for. You should read the PF FAQ about
using multiple internet connections.
Ok, I gotcha, trunk just looked like a ready mad solution for what I
was trying to do... Could you tell me WHY it's not able to be used for
that and what it is for?
I've gone the pf route
On 2006/09/28 10:36, Steve Glaus wrote:
> I am trying to do load-balancing/failover with the trunk pseudo
> interface. I'm not quite sure how to set this up. The following is my
> setup:
>
> sis0 : internal network - 10.110.38.1
> dc0 : dmz
> dc1 : isp1: 24.38.97.22
> dc2 : isp2: 77.2.2.3
that'
8 matches
Mail list logo
