J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Fri, 06 May 2005 16:58:39 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I should additionally add (sorry about that), that it's not something
that hasn't been considered in the past, and I'm considering it again, I
just need to weigh costs for this with the costs for
On Fri, 06 May 2005 16:58:39 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I should additionally add (sorry about that), that it's not something
>that hasn't been considered in the past, and I'm considering it again, I
>just need to weigh costs for this with the costs for making our intern
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:36:38PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> --On 06 May 2005 14:35 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh wrote:
>
> >uptime, and our SLA only guarantees us 99.999%. So, I'm currently
>
> You sometimes find that SLA means something like "we'll charge you more
> so that when things break
--On 06 May 2005 14:35 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh wrote:
uptime, and our SLA only guarantees us 99.999%. So, I'm currently
You sometimes find that SLA means something like "we'll charge you more
so that when things break, we can pay some of it back"...
talking with several companies to have another
L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Abraham Al-Saleh wrote:
Yes, there's only so much I can do to keep everything redundant at
present, something that will change later when we have sufficient money,
a big concern is that someone might dig out our local loop with a back
hoe, nothing I can do
L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Abraham Al-Saleh wrote:
Yes, there's only so much I can do to keep everything redundant at
present, something that will change later when we have sufficient money,
a big concern is that someone might dig out our local loop with a back
hoe, nothing I can do
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Abraham Al-Saleh wrote:
> Yes, there's only so much I can do to keep everything redundant at
> present, something that will change later when we have sufficient money,
> a big concern is that someone might dig out our local loop with a back
> hoe, nothing I can do about that at
Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 06 May 2005 14:35 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh wrote:
uptime, and our SLA only guarantees us 99.999%. So, I'm currently
You sometimes find that SLA means something like "we'll charge you more
so that when things break, we can pay some of it back"...
talking with several c
eric wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 14:54:31 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh proclaimed...
We have a backup generator that will run for five days and can be
refilled while in operation, as well as dual matrix 5000 UPS'. We're
working on an online medical prescribing and patient management
solution, but w
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 14:54:31 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh proclaimed...
> We have a backup generator that will run for five days and can be
> refilled while in operation, as well as dual matrix 5000 UPS'. We're
> working on an online medical prescribing and patient management
> solution, but we're
eric wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 14:35:09 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh proclaimed...
Alright, before I go to far, I'm going to present what I know, what I
need, and what I've read so far. We had a recent scare at my company, we
lost conectivity with our isp for about ten minutes because of a glitch.
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 14:35:09 -0600, Abraham Al-Saleh proclaimed...
> Alright, before I go to far, I'm going to present what I know, what I
> need, and what I've read so far. We had a recent scare at my company, we
> lost conectivity with our isp for about ten minutes because of a glitch.
> Du
12 matches
Mail list logo
