On Jan 16, 2008 1:15 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008/01/16 12:33, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> > I have lowered holdtime for testing purposes only. With default value
> > the behavior is the same. I have just forced local-address to another
> > one, with "local-address 201.70.2
On 2008/01/16 12:33, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> I have lowered holdtime for testing purposes only. With default value
> the behavior is the same. I have just forced local-address to another
> one, with "local-address 201.70.200.2" but still the same.
>
> Here is the tcpdum output
that doesn't look l
On Jan 16, 2008 11:43 AM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008/01/16 11:17, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> > I am setting up OpenBGP for the first time in replacement to Cisco.
> > However, I am having some troubles which I could not realize the
> > reason myself, so I
>
> > holdtime 4
>
>
* Eduardo Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:24]:
> The problem I get is:
>
> neighbor 200.184.196.18 (Intelig): state change Connect -> OpenSent,
> reason: Connection opened
tcp connection has been established and we sent our OPEN message to the
neighbor.
> neighbor 200.184.196.18 (Intel
On 2008/01/16 11:17, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> I am setting up OpenBGP for the first time in replacement to Cisco.
> However, I am having some troubles which I could not realize the
> reason myself, so I
> holdtime 4
can your peers keep up with that? it's rather low.
> Local host: 201.87.
On 2008/01/16 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/01/16 11:17, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> > I am setting up OpenBGP for the first time in replacement to Cisco.
> > However, I am having some troubles which I could not realize the
> > reason myself, so I
>
> > holdtime 4
>
> can your peers keep up
6 matches
Mail list logo
