Cool! That seems to have done the trick (April 20, 2006 snapshot):
(I)nstall, (U)pgrade, or (S)hell? s
# fsck -b32 -f /dev/rwd0d
Alternate Superblock Location: 32
** /dev/rwd0d
** File system is already clean
** Last mounted on
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Ph
Could I conceivably download the latest snapshot bsd.rd and check that
way, rather than upgrading my existing system?
On 13/04/06, Pedro Martelletto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And a fresh kernel too :-)
It would be wise to actually force the checking by specifying -f.
-p.
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Whyzzi wrote:
> > To be on the safe side, run a 3.8 fsck. Easiest way to do that is copy
> > a 3.8 bsd.rd and boot that. Go to the shell and run fsck -f.
> >
> > -Otto
> >
>
> Done. Followed http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#bsd.rd part of the
> FAQ, and ripped the
Oh - and admittedly, one of the directories in the problem partition
has over smaller 5000+ files in it:
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
# ls -al | wc -l
5131
#
# ls -al
total 468
drwxrwxr-x 7 name name 512 Apr 4 21:27 .
drwxrwxr-x 3 name name 512 Apr 4 21:11 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 name name 88064 A
On 08/04/06, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Whyzzi wrote:
>
> > On 07/04/06, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Whyzzi wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeah! that is the thing I didn't do! Run fsck against the affected
> > > > partition! A
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Whyzzi wrote:
> On 07/04/06, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Whyzzi wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah! that is the thing I didn't do! Run fsck against the affected
> > > partition! Anyways, as per your questions:
> > >
> > > I copied the wit
On 07/04/06, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Whyzzi wrote:
>
> > Yeah! that is the thing I didn't do! Run fsck against the affected
> > partition! Anyways, as per your questions:
> >
> > I copied the with cp, eg:
> > # cd /mnt/wd1a
> > # cp -R Anime /mnt/wd2d
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Whyzzi wrote:
> Yeah! that is the thing I didn't do! Run fsck against the affected
> partition! Anyways, as per your questions:
>
> I copied the with cp, eg:
> # cd /mnt/wd1a
> # cp -R Anime /mnt/wd2d
>
> Here are the raw df output from the current snapshot kernel [brought
>
Yeah! that is the thing I didn't do! Run fsck against the affected
partition! Anyways, as per your questions:
I copied the with cp, eg:
# cd /mnt/wd1a
# cp -R Anime /mnt/wd2d
Here are the raw df output from the current snapshot kernel [brought
to you by the wonders of OpenSSH]:
# df
Filesystem 5
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Whyzzi wrote:
> I've had a strange occurance I'd like to report, in using "df -h", but
> the circumstances that brought about this condition are somewhat
> unusual, so I really don't know if it is anything to be concerned
> about. This might also have already been fixed, as I d
11 matches
Mail list logo
