On 2008-05-16, Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This slashdot posting:
>
> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/15/2320243
>
> references a New York Times article published today by Steve Lohr describing a
> new agreement with Microsoft
It also references a pretty interesting
Josh Grosse wrote:
>...
> 1.The decision to push for WXP to replace Linux was due to pressure from
> prospective buyers of the XO laptop, which was slowing sales. "'The people
> who buy the machines are not the children who use them, but government
> officials in most cases,' said Nicholas Neg
Breen,
On 13/10/2006, at 1:20 AM, Breen Ouellette wrote:
Hmm. Let's see. Jack's original post is listed in its entirety
below. I do not see any quotes around the word interesting. If you
read it then you may agree that his meaning is obvious, you may not.
I replied to this...
http://marc.
So... RMS vs. TdR in a hot jello grudge match... who comes out on top?
Sorry, sometimes I just can't help myself. For the most part, this
whole thread seems just that silly.
ring their intended purpose.
List: openbsd-misc
Subject:Re: OLPC
From: "Jack J. Woehr"
Date: 2006-10-10 16:21:45
Message-ID: 1415ECD7-F7E8-4127-8DF3-A04EF94E7F61 () absolute-performance
! com
[Download message RAW]
On Oct 10, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
&g
Breen,
I am replying to this in full because I want my intentions known.
I'll leave it at this.
On 12/10/2006, at 2:58 AM, Breen Ouellette wrote:
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Shane J Pearson wrote:
By "interesting", you mean one is well meaning, but a little
kooky
Breen,
Quoting Breen Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> PS - Jack, some friendly advice, you are only encouraging them each time
> you reply. They obviously don't care about why you find interest in this
> subject. They only want to find a way to link you to RMS and then trash you.
I wasn't trying
On Oct 11, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Breen Ouellette wrote:
> PS - Jack, some friendly advice, you are only encouraging them each
> time you reply. They obviously don't care about why you find
> interest in this subject. They only want to find a way to link you
> to RMS and then trash you.
Thanks,
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Shane J Pearson wrote:
By "interesting", you mean one is well meaning, but a little kooky
and not always in touch with reality and the other is focused and
committed to maintaining some sanity in the world of computing?
No, I didn't
On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Shane J Pearson wrote:
> By "interesting", you mean one is well meaning, but a little kooky
> and not always in touch with reality and the other is focused and
> committed to maintaining some sanity in the world of computing?
No, I didn't mean that. I meant that b
According to Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> http://www.rtos.com/news/detail/?prid=104
>
> "Product Category ThreadX Deployments Representative Customers
> Wireless Networking 200,000,000 Broadcom, Intel, Marvell"
Even more curious is this at the bottom of that sa
On 10/10/06 9:29 PM, ropers wrote:
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
from the above link:
"Technically end-users are not Marvell's customers because it neither
makes nor sells the actual hardware that people use. Instead, it makes
chips that OEMs in turn buy and integrate
Hello Jack,
On 11/10/2006, at 5:35 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Because they're both very strong personalities, both of whom I've met
personally and whom I've interviewed for Dr. Dobb's Journal, and I
find
the contrast between them ... um ... "interesting".
By "interesting", you mean one is we
2006/10/10, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
That archive contains a jpg in base64 format. Here it is in decoded form:
http://ropersonline.com/static/nigerian-classroom.jpg
If you actually want to help 3rd world children:
http://www.vim.org/htmldoc/uganda.html
Laptops are the least of their worrie
On 2006/10/10 12:44, Edward A. Gardner wrote:
> In reading these it seemed obvious that the encumbered IP or microkernel
> that JG talks about is almost certainly ThreadX, produced by Express Logic
> (expresslogic.com or rtos.com).
http://www.rtos.com/news/detail/?prid=104
"Product Category
On 10/10/06, Edward A. Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In reading these it seemed obvious that the encumbered IP or microkernel
that JG talks about is almost certainly ThreadX, produced by Express Logic
(expresslogic.com or rtos.com). I might mention that I have a lot of
experience with embed
At 09:38 10-10-2006, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Some of you may have been following the OLPC discussion. Here is
one place you can read more about it:
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
Since Jim repeatedly mistates our views, I am making the controversial
move of publishing t
On 10/10/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some of you may have been following the OLPC discussion. Here is
one place you can read more about it:
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
from the above link:
"Technically end-users are not Marvell's customers because
On Oct 10, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
>> Every book is new until one has read it. It's interesting to see the
>> different take
>> these two crusaders have on the firmware.
>>
>
> How so?
Because they're both very strong personalities, both of whom I've met
personally and whom I've i
> > How so? They've both been clear about what they want and what they
> > stand
> > for.
>
> Every book is new until one has read it. It's interesting to see the
> different take
> these two crusaders have on the firmware.
>
How so? that RMS is ranting about another undoable unmain
On Oct 10, 2006, at 12:14 PM, bofh wrote:
> On 10/10/06, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> The differences of opinion between Theo and RMS are at least as
>> interesting
>> as the differences between either one and OLPC / the chip vendors!
>
>
> How so? They've both been clear about
On 10/10/06, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > Some of you may have been following the OLPC discussion. Here is
> > one place you can read more about it:
> >
> > http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
> >
>
> The d
On Oct 10, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Some of you may have been following the OLPC discussion. Here is
> one place you can read more about it:
>
> http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
>
The differences of opinion between Theo and RMS are at least as
interesting
23 matches
Mail list logo
