Re: NPPPD Server behind a firewall

2019-10-18 Thread Damian McGuckin
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019, Stuart Henderson wrote: I would srongly recommend switching to IKEv2 if you can, it is far easier to come up with a config that still gives decent crypto with mixed client platforms. (Internal client on Apple OS and non-ancient Windows - strongswan on Android/Linux). I d

Re: NPPPD Server behind a firewall

2019-10-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
>> There are ways to make even Windows clients use actual crypto with IPsec if >> needed, though last I checked it could not be done from the GUI but required >> powershell commands. (I don't have a URL handy, sorry, but this information >> wasn't very hard to find when I needed it.) > > Thanks. I

Re: NPPPD Server behind a firewall

2019-10-14 Thread Damian McGuckin
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 05:55:58PM +1100, Damian McGuckin wrote: Because I had a working L2TP server setup on $L2TP, I was not going to go into its pf.conf, ipsec.conf, or anything else. But here is npppd.conf ike passive esp transport \

Re: NPPPD Server behind a firewall

2019-10-14 Thread Damian McGuckin
I changed /etc/ipsec.conf to have 'ike' reflect the external IP ike passive esp transport \ proto udp from $L2TPX to any port 1701 \ main auth "hmac-sha1" enc "aes" group modp2048 \ quick auth "hmac-sha1" enc "aes" group modp2048 \ psk "MYSECRET" and restarted i

Re: NPPPD Server behind a firewall

2019-10-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 05:55:58PM +1100, Damian McGuckin wrote: > Because I had a working L2TP server setup on $L2TP, I was not going to > go into its pf.conf, ipsec.conf, or anything else. But here is npppd.conf > > ike passive esp transport \ > proto udp from egress to any port 1701