On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Craig Skinner wrote:
> On 2015-01-13 Tue 16:26 PM |, sven falempin wrote:
>>
>> I would like to internally and externally solve some domain names
>> differently (so some service are accessible from inside and outside
>> without some fancy NAT or worse), I found out
On 2015-01-13 Tue 16:26 PM |, sven falempin wrote:
>
> I would like to internally and externally solve some domain names
> differently (so some service are accessible from inside and outside
> without some fancy NAT or worse), I found out 'some' call this setup a
> 'split-dns', often use for inter
On 14/01/15 02:33, Jason Adams wrote:
On 01/13/2015 01:26 PM, sven falempin wrote:
Dear OpenBSD users,
Recently unbound made his way in base, pushing the complex bind/named
out for our own good.
I would like to internally and externally solve some domain names
differently (so some service are
On 2015-01-13, sven falempin wrote:
> Dear OpenBSD users,
>
> Recently unbound made his way in base, pushing the complex bind/named
> out for our own good.
>
> I would like to internally and externally solve some domain names
> differently (so some service are accessible from inside and outside
>
In
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00874/0/Best-Practices-for-those-running-Recursive-Servers.html
one of the recommendations is to separate the two roles:
"Do not combine authoritative and recursive nameserver functions -- have
each function performed by separate server sets"
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015
On 01/13/15 16:26, sven falempin wrote:
> Dear OpenBSD users,
>
> Recently unbound made his way in base, pushing the complex bind/named
> out for our own good.
>
> I would like to internally and externally solve some domain names
> differently (so some service are accessible from inside and outsi
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:33:56PM -0800, Jason Adams wrote:
> Split DNS is a very good reason for using bind, and its not that hard to set
> up.
> I could private email you an example.
>
> If unbound doesn't do this, it is missing one of the main reasons people and
> institutions
> run their ow
On 01/13/2015 01:26 PM, sven falempin wrote:
> Dear OpenBSD users,
>
> Recently unbound made his way in base, pushing the complex bind/named
> out for our own good.
>
> I would like to internally and externally solve some domain names
> differently (so some service are accessible from inside and ou
8 matches
Mail list logo