Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on : > spamassassin and smtp-vilter works quite nicely for this, > you will want to generate an /etc/mail/access containing the > list of valid usernames so you can reject unknown users with > an SMTP error rather than having bounces for all the s

Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

Someone, who I consider very knowledgeable with BSD, liked dspam. Take a look at that. On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:19:54 +0200, Cedric Brisseau wrote > Hi all, > > I must set up a mail gateway for my office. My boss is tired of spam > and I wonder what I can do. I haven't found similar cases in the >

Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

On 2006/09/06 15:43, Chris wrote: > As someone said in this thread - what you want to do is this; Well, that's a matter of opinion. Personally I quite like Postfix for some things, but Sendmail configuration is pretty straightforward, it's in the base OS and generally works pretty well. No need to

Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

Cedric Brisseau wrote: > Hi all, > > I must set up a mail gateway for my office. My boss is tired of spam > and I wonder what I can do. I haven't found similar cases in the > archive. > > Our mail server (which runs MS Exchange) receives mails from a master > site "filtering" mails by applying a

Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

At 01:19 PM 9/6/2006 +0200, Cedric Brisseau wrote: Hi all, I must set up a mail gateway for my office. My boss is tired of spam and I wonder what I can do. I haven't found similar cases in the archive. Our mail server (which runs MS Exchange) receives mails from a master site "filtering" mails

Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

On 9/6/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2006/09/06 14:28, Guido Tschakert wrote: > >> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly. > > oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"? > > I think he means, the mail are fetched from their provider with

Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

Cedric Brisseau wrote: I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly. Maybe you have similar cases with spamassassin+clamav or relaydb, procmail ? postfix (with basic smtpd restrictions that can do wonders) clamav + spamassassin (with bayes enabled) ran from amavisd You

Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

On 2006/09/06 14:28, Guido Tschakert wrote: > >> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly. > > oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"? > > I think he means, the mail are fetched from their provider with a > mechanism similar to fetchmail and their provider al

Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2006/09/06 13:19, Cedric Brisseau wrote: >> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly. > > oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"? > > I think he means, the mail are fetched from their provider with a mechanism similar to fetch

Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

On 9/6/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2006/09/06 13:19, Cedric Brisseau wrote: > I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly. oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"? Mails are redistributed from the master site (unix, smtp) to the diffe

Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

On 2006/09/06 13:19, Cedric Brisseau wrote: > I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly. > Maybe you have similar cases with spamassassin+clamav or relaydb, > procmail ? spamassassin and smtp-vilter works quite nicely for this, you will want to generate an /etc/mail/acces

Re: Mail gateway behind MS Exchange

On 2006/09/06 13:19, Cedric Brisseau wrote: > I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly. oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"?