No argument there on the pragmatics.
But it does work, and a lot of places use it.
~BAS
FYI I wasn't advocating implementing it; just providing background. If
you want it, shell the $500k for the hardware L.B.
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 00:07 +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 1
We host our own web-servers so DSR shouldn't be a problem. Will probably
get rid of the co-located balancers and bring them inside our network as
we dont really gain anything from co-locating. Might just use something
simple like lbnamed !
Adam wrote:
Linden Varley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Linden Varley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Load-balancers were co-located for redundancy reasons I believe. Its
> just a shame traffic in/out is paid-for so even if web-servers were also
> co-located then traffic will still be metered.
If your web servers and load balancers aren't on the same n
Load-balancers were co-located for redundancy reasons I believe. Its
just a shame traffic in/out is paid-for so even if web-servers were also
co-located then traffic will still be metered.
We could bring the load-balancers into our network to stop this problem
but we have two-sites on differen
Linden Varley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only reason we need DSR is our load-balancers are co-located and we
> have a limit on data usage so the connection needs to be offloaded to
> the server/client and not proxied as this would get quite expensive with
> the traffic flowing through our
The only reason we need DSR is our load-balancers are co-located and we
have a limit on data usage so the connection needs to be offloaded to
the server/client and not proxied as this would get quite expensive with
the traffic flowing through our co-location pipe.
Might have to move to Linux w
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 12:36:33PM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> Such as Distributed computing environments where you have your HAL4
> service VIP on the same segment/subnet as your distributed server farm.
>
so they should redesign their network instead of inventing crazy
features. this DSR
Such as Distributed computing environments where you have your HAL4
service VIP on the same segment/subnet as your distributed server farm.
Or HA databses
~BAS
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:49 +0200, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
> best pf network stack cannot solve.
--
Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROT
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:05:44 +0200
Reyk Floeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i don't like the idea about "DSR", it sounds like an evil hack to get
> some performance at the wrong place. it is better to focus on
> improving the pf/network stack performance itself and to be able to do
> traffic fi
This is like "Local Triangulation" in Radware-speak? (Don't know what
F5) calls it. Basically you bring up an alias on lo0 or lo1 primary as
the inet4 of your HAL4 address and as long as everything is in the same
subnet...
~BAS
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 12:25 +1000, Linden Varley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:42:24AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:54:58 +0800
> Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Linden Varley wrote:
> > > Anyone know of any load balancing software for OpenBSD that can do
> > > direct-server return? (our load balancers
> > pass in on $ext_if route-to { $webh1, $webh2 } round-robin proto
> > tcp \ from any to $virt_ip port http no state
> > pass out on $int_if from any to $virt_ip port http no state
>
> Wouldn't you need some kind of state here? Otherwise there's no
> guarantee of the packets for a given connec
Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:40:36 +1000
Darren Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
1. add a static published arp entry for the cluster address on the
balancer with its own mac address so packets aimed at the cluster
address will go to the balancer.
2. configure al
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:40:36 +1000
Darren Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be possible to to this the way the IBM eNetwork dispatchers
> used to do this? Put all of the machines on the same broadcast
> domain, then:
>
> 1. add a static published arp entry for the cluster address on
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:54:58 +0800
Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Linden Varley wrote:
> > Anyone know of any load balancing software for OpenBSD that can do
> > direct-server return? (our load balancers (openbsd boxes) are
> > co-located and we pay for all data bandwidth).
>
> hostst
Linden Varley wrote:
Anyone know of any load balancing software for OpenBSD that can do
direct-server return? (our load balancers (openbsd boxes) are co-located
and we pay for all data bandwidth).
hoststated?
---
Lars Hansson
On 6/12/07, Linden Varley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is generally for http layer requests but I don't think apache
re-directs will suffice.
You may want to look at pound. A lot of people seem to like it.
--
"This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity."
-- Sandhurst
17 matches
Mail list logo
