* Adam M. Dutko [2011-01-22 19:09]:
> > give it up. you obviously have no idea what you're talking about. an
> > ifaddr is tiny.
>
> So what is the base size of one?
you can do your homework yourself, really.
it is tiny.
> Can you elaborate how it grows over time based on various levels of
> tr
"Adam M. Dutko" writes:
>> give it up. you obviously have no idea what you're talking about. an
>> ifaddr is tiny.
>
> So what is the base size of one? Can you elaborate how it grows over
> time based on various levels of traffic?
grep in your /usr/src/sys for '.h files containing "struct ifadd
> give it up. you obviously have no idea what you're talking about. an
> ifaddr is tiny.
So what is the base size of one? Can you elaborate how it grows over
time based on various levels of traffic?
* Adam M. Dutko [2011-01-22 00:00]:
> > Hahaha.
>
> I don't understand the humor.
>
> > I've had over 300k addresses on a single interface in a test environment
> > before.
>
> Very cool, so it was a test environment. Did you roll it to
> production? How well did it work?
>
> > Like Henning
> Hahaha.
I don't understand the humor.
> I've had over 300k addresses on a single interface in a test environment
> before.
Very cool, so it was a test environment. Did you roll it to
production? How well did it work?
> Like Henning said, the limit is memory.
I imagine memory would be a big
* Benny Lofgren [2011-01-21 19:33]:
> On 2011-01-21 18.42, Peter Hessler wrote:
> > On 2011 Jan 21 (Fri) at 09:51:52 -0500 (-0500), Adam M. Dutko wrote:
> > :> What it's the limit of number alias that a single ethernet interface can
> > :> support?
> > :
> > :I believe 254?
> > Hahaha.
> > I've ha
On 2011-01-21 18.42, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2011 Jan 21 (Fri) at 09:51:52 -0500 (-0500), Adam M. Dutko wrote:
> :> What it's the limit of number alias that a single ethernet interface can
> :> support?
> :
> :I believe 254?
> Hahaha.
> I've had over 300k addresses on a single interface in a test
On 2011 Jan 21 (Fri) at 09:51:52 -0500 (-0500), Adam M. Dutko wrote:
:> What it's the limit of number alias that a single ethernet interface can
:> support?
:
:I believe 254?
:
Hahaha.
I've had over 300k addresses on a single interface in a test environment
before.
Like Henning said, the limit i
> What it's the limit of number alias that a single ethernet interface can
> support?
I believe 254?
* Orestes Leal R. [2011-01-21 15:50]:
> What it's the limit of number alias that a single ethernet interface
> can support?
memory.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Ro
10 matches
Mail list logo