Le Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:29:42AM +0200, Toni Mueller ecrivait :
> My experience from running some low-traffic sites with both nginx and
> lighttpd is that nginx is by far easier to handle, more robust, and
> also more flexible in its configuration, and I hope to get rid of
> lighttpd asap (eg. "m
Hi,
On Sun, 20.07.2008 at 21:03:03 +0200, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Henning Brauer wrote:
> > lighttpd.
>
> can it do reverse proxying, as needed for zope?
in theory, it can, but I didn't try.
My experience from running some low-traffic sites with both nginx and
lighttpd is th
> nice. btw, there is also a light http server called nostromo,
> developed by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's nhttpd, didn't you rtfm? The monkeys will eat you alive if you
didn't (beats masturbating the whole day).
--
Nuno MagalhC#es
* Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008-07-20, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Henning Brauer wrote:
> >> lighttpd.
> >
> > can it do reverse proxying, as needed for zope?
>
> it definitely can in 1.5, I'm not sure about the in-tree version
> but I think it's likely.
nice. btw, there i
On 2008-07-20, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Henning Brauer wrote:
>> lighttpd.
>
> can it do reverse proxying, as needed for zope?
it definitely can in 1.5, I'm not sure about the in-tree version
but I think it's likely.
* Henning Brauer wrote:
> lighttpd.
can it do reverse proxying, as needed for zope?
>
> --
> Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
> Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
> Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting -
Henning Brauer wrote:
lighttpd.
So far I am very happy with lighttpd, including running with PHP via FastCGI.
I don't really trust the PHP applications I run, so they operate in a
separate chroot (via spawn-php.sh) as a separate user in addition to lighttpd
itself being chroot as a separate
lighttpd.
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Calomel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nuno,
>
> I would highly suggest looking into Nginx. It is easy to build from
> source and runs efficiently, using little memory or CPU time. Even
> though it is a light web server compared to Apache, Nginx is able to
> handle h
There is also a package of the stable version of nginx. If you need
features from the development version or want different modules than the
package then build from source. But why not use the existing
port/package if it suits you?
As for which light http server, it might be best to try out severa
Nuno,
I would highly suggest looking into Nginx. It is easy to build from
source and runs efficiently, using little memory or CPU time. Even
though it is a light web server compared to Apache, Nginx is able to
handle high traffic loads. The WordPress blogging system recently
converted all of its l
11 matches
Mail list logo
