Hi Daniel and Misc@,
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:29:22 +0700, Daniel Ouellet
wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer
about
how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints
are
j
Hi All,
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:01:50 +0700, FRLinux wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Daniel Ouellet
wrote:
I was clearly out of place.
Same to you Steph, I shouldn't have reacted so quickly to your email
address
and have wrongly concluded to an other Linux quick miss place question
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:29:22PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about
how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are
ju
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:29:22PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
>>> Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about
>> how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are
>> just wron
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> I was clearly out of place.
>
> Same to you Steph, I shouldn't have reacted so quickly to your email address
> and have wrongly concluded to an other Linux quick miss place question, or
> reaction.
What I've learned from this is fairly simp
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about
how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are
just wrong. Sure people are encuraged to run snapshot kernels but
selfbuilt kernels are fi
Hi Claudio and Misc@,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:35:30 +0700, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:58:08PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +07
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Robert wrote:
> Wrong.
> Reporting problems with kernels built from unmodified source is fine.
Appologies, I stant corrected.
Steph
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:58:08PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> And note that there have recently been changes in the way pf
>> keeps track of icmp, so this may well be a valid report.
>
> Could sure be I give you that. However, still true that snapshot is the
> way to
On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:58:08 -0500 Daniel Ouellet
wrote:
> Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
>
> Best,
> Daniel
With all due respect Daniel, I disagree, and I think you've misread
things a bit. The original poster, Insan Praja, stated he had a panic
with both a GENERIC kernel, and with the sn
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:58:08PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>>> Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Pr
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW
wrote:
Hi Misc@,
on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It say
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Insan Praja SW wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW
>>> wrote:
Hi Misc@,
on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It say
Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW
wrote:
Hi Misc@,
on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says:
Hello,
As far as I know, home built kernel is not supported, you need to try
out a
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:17:57 +
FRLinux wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As far as I know, home built kernel is not supported, you need to try
> out a snapshot instead and see if it works.
>
> Cheers,
> Steph
Wrong.
Reporting problems with kernels built from unmodified source is fine.
- Robert
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW
wrote:
Hi Misc@,
on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says:
Hello,
As far as I know, home built kernel is not supported, you need to try
out a snapshot instead and s
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote:
> Hi Misc@,
> on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says:
Hello,
As far as I know, home built kernel is not supported, you need to try
out a snapshot instead and see if it works.
Cheers,
Steph
17 matches
Mail list logo
