On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Stephan Wehner wrote:
> Let's get at this the other way round: What good comes from a
> designing the df command so that it might hang? I took it for granted
> there were no advantages.
Do not assume it has been designed to hang. I was to get some details
from you, so I can l
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Stephan Wehner wrote:
> Let's get at this the other way round: What good comes from a
> designing the df command so that it might hang? I took it for granted
> there were no advantages.
the df command was not designed so it may hang.
--
And that's why they call me Cap'n Win
Let's get at this the other way round: What good comes from a
designing the df command so that it might hang? I took it for granted
there were no advantages.
Stephan
On 6/28/05, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Stephan Wehner wrote:
>
> > I'm running df and it
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Stephan Wehner wrote:
> I'm running df and it just hangs.
>
> ^C doesn't interrupt it. ^Z doesn't interrupt it.
>
> My guess is that some filesystem is not responding; still I should be
> able to get my console back, shouldn't I?
>
> Is this the BSD way? (My other linux ma
4 matches
Mail list logo