Re: Intel Firmware license analysis

2006-10-02 Thread bofh
On 10/2/06, Greg Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/1/06, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know - I nmaped a slingbox, and to my surprise, it returned an > > OpenBSD 3.7(or something) > > Is that a misidentification or does anyone know if they are running > OpenBSD? We have some Slin

Re: Intel Firmware license analysis

2006-10-02 Thread Greg Thomas
On 10/1/06, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/1/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What if some vendor decides that they like OpenBSD so much that they > want to turn it (or a part of it) into a commercial product, perhaps > for a specialized market segment we do not reach? So

Re: Intel Firmware license analysis

2006-10-01 Thread bofh
On 10/1/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What if some vendor decides that they like OpenBSD so much that they > want to turn it (or a part of it) into a commercial product, perhaps > for a specialized market segment we do not reach? So they would take > the OpenBSD source tree and

Re: Intel Firmware license analysis

2006-10-01 Thread Matthew R. Dempsky
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:06:46PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > But this does bring up the side question: Is all of Red Hat > "Enterprise Linux" licensed under the licenses stated at > http://opensource.org/licenses, [...] Obviously not---they include the IPW firmware.