On 2016-09-13, Fernando Gont wrote:
> On 08/09/2016 07:42 AM, Laurent CARON wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anybody have a clue about this issue ? Thanks
>
> Based on a quick look at what you sent, this is not what I would expect.
>
>
>> Am I mistaken on something, or is this behavior perfectly normal ?
On 08/09/2016 07:42 AM, Laurent CARON wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody have a clue about this issue ? Thanks
Based on a quick look at what you sent, this is not what I would expect.
> Am I mistaken on something, or is this behavior perfectly normal ?
>
> Please note # tracepath6 from the linux bo
Hi,
Does anybody have a clue about this issue ? Thanks
Setup:
Source: Linux box: 2a02:27d0:100:115:6000::200
Destination: OpenBSD 5.9-stable box: 2a02:27d0:116::3
Source#: ping6 -M do -s 1232 2a02:27d0:100:114::3
PING 2a02:27d0:100:114::3(2a02:27d0:100:114::3) 1232 data bytes
1240 bytes from
Hi,
After some more tests:
Source: Linux machine with IPv6: 2a02:27d0:0:5e0d:1a03:73ff:feba:50b4
Destination: Linux machine with IPv6: 2a02:27d0:0:5e0d:428d:5cff:fea5:501e
source# ping6 -M do -s 1300 2a02:27d0:0:5e0d:428d:5cff:fea5:501e
destination# tcpdump -ni enp3s0 host 2a02:27d0:0:5e0d:1a03:
Hi,
Back to this issue:
Setup:
Source: Linux box: 2a02:27d0:100:115:6000::200
Destination: OpenBSD 5.9-stable box: 2a02:27d0:116::3
Source#: ping6 -M do -s 1232 2a02:27d0:100:114::3
PING 2a02:27d0:100:114::3(2a02:27d0:100:114::3) 1232 data bytes
1240 bytes from 2a02:27d0:100:114::3: icmp_seq=1
I tried "ping6 2001:7f8:54::250" myself right now.
Sorry, that should have read:
"I tried
$ ping6 -s 1234 2001:7f8:54::145 "
(I did send the packets to ..::145 , not the other one)
Hello,
on 17.05.2016 14:05, Laurent CARON wrote:
When sending a ping 6 to a destination not accepting fragmented
packets, I experience loss with "big" (but < 1500) packets.
% ping6 -s 1234 2001:7f8:54::250
Ex:
14:03:07.959532 2001:7f8:54::145 > 2001:7f8:54::250: frag
(0xbfb11fea:1232@0+) icmp
7 matches
Mail list logo