lat Romain; 'misc@openbsd.org' (misc@openbsd.org)
Subject: Re: HA / load balancing / fail-over using CARP
Hi, You can already do active-active CARP with OpenBSD. I believe it hashes by
the MAC address (the MAC hash dictates which firewall responds to an ARP for
the gateway IP).
However you
mardi 23 juin 2015 11:25
> To: Romain FABBRI
> Cc: Aviolat Romain; 'misc@openbsd.org' (misc@openbsd.org)
> Subject: Re: HA / load balancing / fail-over using CARP
>
> Hi, You can already do active-active CARP with OpenBSD. I believe it hashes
by the MAC address (the MAC hash di
Hi, You can already do active-active CARP with OpenBSD. I believe it hashes by
the MAC address (the MAC hash dictates which firewall responds to an ARP for
the gateway IP).
However you may have issues with states and state synchronisation depending on
the pps and firewall hardware performance, mea
Not sure you really want to do that but you could achieve some IP or MAC Load
Balancing using this kind of setup :
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/carp/carp4.html
-Message d'origine-
De : owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] De la part de
Aviolat Romain
Envoyé : lun
Well, if one falls over unexpectedly, you would actually want one box to be
able to handle the full load, otherwise when the HA kicks in (due to
planned or unplanned downtime), you would get a poor or useless situation
depending on how the services handle the downgrade.
It smells like people who r
5 matches
Mail list logo
