Re: Google in "shell" - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Dag Richards
Mark Zimmerman wrote: On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Dag Richards wrote: Ted Unangst wrote: If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want graphical interwebs. Exactly. So, can you launch a gra

Re: Google in "shell" - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Mark Zimmerman
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Dag Richards wrote: > Ted Unangst wrote: > > If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm > > already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want > > graphical interwebs. > > Exactly. > So, can you launch a graphical

Re: Google in "shell" - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Dag Richards
Ted Unangst wrote: If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want graphical interwebs. Exactly.

Re: Google in "shell" - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Ted Unangst
If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want graphical interwebs.

Re: Google in "shell" - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-06-04, William Bulley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to Marti Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother? >> >> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: >> >> >> >

Re: Google in "shell" - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Marco Peereboom
And what are the colorblind doing with it? On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:09:32AM -0400, William Bulley wrote: > According to Marti Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother? > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: Google in "shell" - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Jason Beaudoin
2008/6/4 Tomas Bodzar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > http://goosh.org > > while borderline useless in some respects, it's a tremendously interesting concept. :D thanks! (sorry Marti for that last message..) -- IEEE Student Branch President Wentworth Institute of Technology 550 Huntington Ave. Boston,

Re: Google in "shell" - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread William Bulley
According to Marti Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother? > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > >> > >> http://goosh.org > >> > > > > Great. Doesn't work with links eit

Re: Google in "shell" - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Cesare Gargano
On 04/06/08 07:59 -0700, Marti Martinez wrote: > Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother? > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > >> http://goosh.org > >> > >> > > > > Great. > > > > > > > > -- > Systems

Re: Google in "shell" - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Marti Martinez
Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother? On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: >> http://goosh.org >> >> > > Great. > > -- Systems Programmer, Principal Electrical & Computer Engineering The University of Arizon

Re: Google in "shell" - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Cesare Gargano
On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > http://goosh.org > > Great.