Re: Firefox, Chrome, Libreoffice bogus syscall on -current

2024-01-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024-01-01, Ax0n wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 7:33 PM Stuart Henderson > wrote: > >> Pity, without the deletes a transcript of a run of pkg_add -u -v >> might have shown why the packages didn't get updated. They should have, >> and in most cases they do. >> > > Here's the pkg_add -uiv

Re: Firefox, Chrome, Libreoffice bogus syscall on -current

2024-01-01 Thread Ax0n
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 7:33 PM Stuart Henderson wrote: > Pity, without the deletes a transcript of a run of pkg_add -u -v > might have shown why the packages didn't get updated. They should have, > and in most cases they do. > Here's the pkg_add -uiv output that I saved while removing stuff

Re: Firefox, Chrome, Libreoffice bogus syscall on -current

2023-12-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2023-12-29, Ax0n wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2023, 11:21 Theo de Raadt wrote: > >> Then your machine is not -current, not by a long shot. >> >> We moved to libc.so.98.0 on Dec 12. >> >> At least two rounds of new packages have shown up since then. >> >> I do believe there are circumstances where

Re: Firefox, Chrome, Libreoffice bogus syscall on -current

2023-12-29 Thread Ax0n
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023, 11:21 Theo de Raadt wrote: > Then your machine is not -current, not by a long shot. > > We moved to libc.so.98.0 on Dec 12. > > At least two rounds of new packages have shown up since then. > > I do believe there are circumstances where pkg_add fails to update > library pack

Re: Firefox, Chrome, Libreoffice bogus syscall on -current

2023-12-29 Thread Theo de Raadt
Ax0n wrote: > And yes, quite a lot of stuff referencing libc.so.97.1 in /usr/local - 223 > files in bin, 361 in lib, 0 in sbin. Then your machine is not -current, not by a long shot. We moved to libc.so.98.0 on Dec 12. At least two rounds of new packages have shown up since then. I do believ

Re: Firefox, Chrome, Libreoffice bogus syscall on -current

2023-12-29 Thread Ax0n
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023, 11:00 Stuart Henderson wrote: Not sure how much core dumps will help, but if you can try running the binaries with problems with LD_DEBUG set in the environment (to anything) and capture output (e.g. using script(1) as it will likely be copious) that might give clues. I'll

Re: Firefox, Chrome, Libreoffice bogus syscall on -current

2023-12-28 Thread Theo de Raadt
Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2023-12-27, Ax0n wrote: > > I had been running #1471 since December 5th without issue, and this week > > upgraded to the latest snapshot (#1567) after which some apps such as > > Firefox won't run. They display "msyscall a8000 error" followed by a > > core dump. dme

Re: Firefox, Chrome, Libreoffice bogus syscall on -current

2023-12-28 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2023-12-27, Ax0n wrote: > I had been running #1471 since December 5th without issue, and this week > upgraded to the latest snapshot (#1567) after which some apps such as > Firefox won't run. They display "msyscall a8000 error" followed by a > core dump. dmesg(1) shows a bogus syscall. I did e

Re: Firefox, Chrome, Libreoffice bogus syscall on -current

2023-12-27 Thread Theo de Raadt
b...@fea.st wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2023, at 00:41, Ax0n wrote: > > I had been running #1471 since December 5th without issue, and this week > > upgraded to the latest snapshot (#1567) after which some apps such as > > Firefox won't run. They display "msyscall a8000 error" followed by a > > core

Re: Firefox, Chrome, Libreoffice bogus syscall on -current

2023-12-27 Thread bsd
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023, at 00:41, Ax0n wrote: > I had been running #1471 since December 5th without issue, and this week > upgraded to the latest snapshot (#1567) after which some apps such as > Firefox won't run. They display "msyscall a8000 error" followed by a > core dump. dmesg(1) shows a bogus