Re: Dual-NSD setup management

2015-05-27 Thread Felipe Scarel
Thanks for the input Stuart and Bryan, I think the dual-authoritative setup might indeed be overkill. I'll look into unbound local-data options, hadn't considered that. On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Bryan Irvine wrote: > Additionally to all this good advice, you can create multiple loopback >

Re: Dual-NSD setup management

2015-05-27 Thread Bryan Irvine
Additionally to all this good advice, you can create multiple loopback interfaces if you did want to use divert-to. 'ifconfig create lo1' then you don't need to use weird ports to accomplish things. On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015-05-26, Felipe Scarel wrote: >

Re: Dual-NSD setup management

2015-05-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015-05-26, Felipe Scarel wrote: > after reading some documentation on the NSD manpage and online, it > seems there's no support for views as offered with BIND. I've gathered > that the general suggestion is to run two separate instances (running > on 127.0.0.1, for example), and divert traffic

Re: Dual-NSD setup management

2015-05-26 Thread Craig Skinner
On 2015-05-26 Tue 11:39 AM |, Felipe Scarel wrote: > > after reading some documentation on the NSD manpage and online, it > seems there's no support for views as offered with BIND. It can sort of be done via an unbound stub (proxy) to a different NSD served zone for internal hosts 5.5: http://m