On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:28 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
>
> OTOH, *directing* the muddled masses to HIS machine [even if by mistake]
> would give pause, would it not? Doesn't seem like a good policy security
> to me, ..
>
>Lee
>
>
Uhh. Security through Obscurity is no Security.
Is http:/
On May 19 13:54:34, Bohdan Tashchuk wrote:
> > The server openbsd.org is actually cvs.openbsd.org,
> > that is the main machine in Theo's basement.
> > Nobody should ever use that one for anything.
>
> For many many years I've been typing
>
>example.com
>
> without leading www. Back in the 1
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:16:54PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> [...]
> The server openbsd.org is actually cvs.openbsd.org,
> that is the main machine in Theo's basement.
> Nobody should ever use that one for anything.
> It has whatever data Theo sees fit for whatever
> purpose, sometimes for test
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Bohdan Tashchuk wrote:
>
> > I suggest that there are many clueless people like me out there. The
> default behavior should be changed. opendbsd.org should redirect to
> www.openbsd.org, and the people who need to access t
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Bohdan Tashchuk wrote:
> I suggest that there are many clueless people like me out there. The default
> behavior should be changed. opendbsd.org should redirect to www.openbsd.org,
> and the people who need to access the machine in Theo's basement should go to
On 19 May 2010 22:54, Bohdan Tashchuk wrote:
>> The server openbsd.org is actually cvs.openbsd.org,
>> that is the main machine in Theo's basement.
>> Nobody should ever use that one for anything.
>
> For many many years I've been typing
>
> example.com
>
> without leading www. Back in the 1990s
> The server openbsd.org is actually cvs.openbsd.org,
> that is the main machine in Theo's basement.
> Nobody should ever use that one for anything.
For many many years I've been typing
example.com
without leading www. Back in the 1990s nytimes.com didn't work, and
www.nytimes.com did. But s
On 2010-05-19, stupidmail4me wrote:
> Still running 4.6. Haven't read the changelog yet and didn't realize syntax
> changed. Leads to errors means you type that syntax in and it leads to errors.
> Makes sense since I'm still running 4.6.
"As with the rest of the FAQ, this set of documents is focu
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote on Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:26:50PM +0200:
> some anonymous coward wrote:
>> Look at the differences between:
>> http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html and
>> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html
> the first for some reason has an old version,
The server openbsd.org is ac
rms in the
pub/OpenBSD/doc directory of your favorite download mirror.
Nick.
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Nick Holland
wrote:
From: Nick Holland
Subject: Re: Differences between
www.openbsd.org and openbsd.org
To: "stupidmail4me"
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Wednesday, May 19,
201
stupidmail4me wrote:
Look at the differences between: http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html
and http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html
The difference is drastic. Information on www.openbsd.org leads to
errors. Why are these pages different?
what does "leads to errors" mean?
As for why they are d
Still running 4.6. Haven't read the changelog yet and didn't realize syntax
changed. Leads to errors means you type that syntax in and it leads to errors.
Makes sense since I'm still running 4.6.
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Nick Holland
wrote:
> From: Nick Holland
> Subject: Re
stupidmail4me writes:
> The difference is drastic. Information on www.openbsd.org leads to errors.
> Why are these pages different?
the first for some reason has an old version, while the www one has
the documentation updated per OpenBSD 4.7, which was released today.
yes, 4.7 is a flag day re
13 matches
Mail list logo
