On 7/15/07, Braden Mailloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adriaan wrote:
> On 7/15/07, Braden Mailloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Dear Readers;
>>
>> I've been using the log feature of pf and have found that, when
>> attempting to access my webserver via dns, that pf does not block any
>> traff
Braden Mailloux wrote:
Adriaan wrote:
On 7/15/07, Braden Mailloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Readers;
I've been using the log feature of pf and have found that, when
attempting to access my webserver via dns, that pf does not block any
traffic. I also added a log to my "block in quick fr
Adriaan wrote:
On 7/15/07, Braden Mailloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Readers;
I've been using the log feature of pf and have found that, when
attempting to access my webserver via dns, that pf does not block any
traffic. I also added a log to my "block in quick from urpf-failed" and
that
On 7/15/07, Braden Mailloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Readers;
I've been using the log feature of pf and have found that, when
attempting to access my webserver via dns, that pf does not block any
traffic. I also added a log to my "block in quick from urpf-failed" and
that has returned no
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/07/14 21:21, Braden Mailloux wrote:
block in quick from urpf-failed
I would get a 'log' on here too
A follow up, when running the route show command, the routing table prints
with excruciatingly slow speed, its been almost 8 minutes and it is stil
On 2007/07/14 21:21, Braden Mailloux wrote:
>> block in quick from urpf-failed
I would get a 'log' on here too
> A follow up, when running the route show command, the routing table prints
> with excruciatingly slow speed, its been almost 8 minutes and it is still
> going.
It looks up names, tr
On 7/15/07, Braden Mailloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Readers;
#Default block policy
block log all
You have a nice "block log all" policy. How about using the debugging
capabilities of this policy?
Run tcpdump on the pflog0 interface to see the blocked packets.
tcpdump -eni pflog0.
Braden Mailloux wrote:
Dear Readers;
I'm using 4.1 with the generic kernel.
Here is my dmesg:
# dmesg
OpenBSD 4.1 (GENERIC) #1435: Sat Mar 10 19:07:45 MST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel Pentium III ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 552
MHz
8 matches
Mail list logo