On 16 jun 2005, at 16.45, Stephen Marley wrote:
Is this known behaviour with the code in its current state, or
should I
be looking at my configuration or reporting a problem?
Yes, I've seen it. Unfortunately I have lots of other work at the
moment, so it'll probably be a week or so before
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:34:06AM +, Ryan McBride wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:06:53AM +0100, Stephen Marley wrote:
> > Is there a way to make a pair of carp hosts to renegotiate with an
> > existing ipsec peer when a new carp master is elected? I tried it once
> > and it didn't work ou
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:34:06AM +, Ryan McBride wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:06:53AM +0100, Stephen Marley wrote:
> > Is there a way to make a pair of carp hosts to renegotiate with an
> > existing ipsec peer when a new carp master is elected? I tried it once
> > and it didn't work ou
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:06:53AM +0100, Stephen Marley wrote:
> Is there a way to make a pair of carp hosts to renegotiate with an
> existing ipsec peer when a new carp master is elected? I tried it once
> and it didn't work out.
If the connection to the ipsec peer is not passive, you can use
if
Stephen Marley wrote:
Is there a way to make a pair of carp hosts to renegotiate with an
existing ipsec peer when a new carp master is elected? I tried it once
and it didn't work out.
Hakan is working on sasync that synchronize IPSec SAs, but as of May
25th, it's not ready for public consumpt
5 matches
Mail list logo
