Re: Bad performance with re(4)

2014-08-26 Thread chester . t . field
On 8/26/2014 at 1:02 PM, "Brent Cook" wrote: >That sounds really familiar. I had a random sparc machine show >very similar behavior with multiple operating systems. It turned >out it did not like to play nicely with my gigabit switch and was >constantly renegotiating link speed. I think it had

Re: Bad performance with re(4)

2014-08-26 Thread Brent Cook
On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Chester T. Field wrote: > Hi friends, > > I'm experiencing really poor network performance via the Realtek 8101E (re) > Ethernet card on my HP Mini 110. Using the default setting of tcpbench > I'm getting an average Mbps of 0.172 versus a compatible machine (Asus

Re: Bad performance with re(4)

2014-08-26 Thread Chris Cappuccio
chester.t.fi...@hushmail.com [chester.t.fi...@hushmail.com] wrote: > On 8/26/2014 at 12:27 PM, "Chris Cappuccio" wrote:Chester > T. Field [chester.fi...@hushmail.com] wrote: > >> Hi friends, > >> > > >Have you verified it's an openbsd-only problem? This driver is well supported > >and provides

Re: Bad performance with re(4)

2014-08-26 Thread chester . t . field
On 8/26/2014 at 12:27 PM, "Chris Cappuccio" wrote:Chester T. Field [chester.fi...@hushmail.com] wrote: >> Hi friends, >> >Have you verified it's an openbsd-only problem? This driver is well supported >and provides good performance in my experience. I tried it under Linux and I'm seeing the sa

Re: Bad performance with re(4)

2014-08-26 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Chester T. Field [chester.fi...@hushmail.com] wrote: > Hi friends, > > I'm experiencing really poor network performance via the Realtek 8101E (re) > Ethernet card on my HP Mini 110. Using the default setting of tcpbench > I'm getting an average Mbps of 0.172 versus a compatible machine (Asus > E