On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:10:40PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote:
> Uhm. I had some time and because I was working on similar code I created
> what I conceived in this. Basically tun(2) in link-layer mode are able to
> be bridged (yay), didn't know it could be done. The code proved it. However
> t
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 07:00:10PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote:
> You may even do it cheaper than that with a bit of programming and it doesn't
> require a purchase of any network gear, however the functionality may not be
> there in the tun(4) driver.
>
> Basically what I'm thinking of is the foll
On 7/7/06, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the motivation for asking this is that i'm running an ecommerce website from
work and am interested in having a failover and/or loadbalancing for it in the
event that the power goes out at work, etc. colocating the machine that serves
it is
On 2006/07/07 10:56, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> the motivation for asking this is that i'm running an ecommerce website from
> work and am interested in having a failover and/or loadbalancing for it in the
> event that the power goes out at work, etc. colocating the machine that serves
> it is prob
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | (2) are there any particular online docs that are
> recommended reading for
> BGP?
>
> The RFC (I think it's 1771) is very good, check it out.
Superseded by RFC4271. I also found
http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters to be a good reference, with
other relate
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:30:06PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote:
> I think you can do it with the following: Get 2 cheap routers that can pass
> 3Mb/s, no big functionality needed except that they do ethernet (Cisco 2500's?
> they should be cheap by now..), 2 switches for the etherlink between the
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:56:11AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> already have available (the 2 ADSL connections + old hw).
>
> i think CARPing machines when they're in different public IP blocks won't
> work,
> i.e. x.y.z.w/29 and a.b.c.d/29 cannot have a single address CARPed across
> blocks
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:56:11AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> i think CARPing machines when they're in different public IP blocks
> won't work, i.e. x.y.z.w/29 and a.b.c.d/29 cannot have a single
> address CARPed across blocks. do tell if i'm wrong on this one since
> this would work nicely
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:02:47PM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
| i've started doing some background reading on how BGP works and am adrift in
a
| sea of acronyms. i'm confident that i'll learn how to swim, but there are a
few
| questions that i'd like answers to before i make the time investmen
Original message
>Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:54:24 +0200
>From: Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: BGP questions
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>* Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-07 08:47]:
>> > would i need an AS number if this
* Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-07 08:47]:
> > would i need an AS number if this would work?
>
> Yup. That's not all. You need at least a /20 (AFAIK) to be able for large
> backbones to even consider routing your advertisement. But this was heresay
> years ago, I don't know if it s
On 07/07/06, Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:02:47PM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> > (1) i have 2 blocks of 8 static IPs at my disposal, one at home and one
> at work,
>
> So two /29's ?
>
> > and both connections are 3Mb/512Kb ADSL via PPPoE. the upstrea
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:02:47PM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> (1) i have 2 blocks of 8 static IPs at my disposal, one at home and one at
> work,
So two /29's ?
> and both connections are 3Mb/512Kb ADSL via PPPoE. the upstream traffic at
> work
> is beginning to saturate the connection an
13 matches
Mail list logo
