Re: 3.8 pf.conf question

2005-12-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 04 December 2005 14:27 -0600, eric wrote: On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 11:39:01 -0800, Rodney Hopkins proclaimed... I was looking at the pf.conf included with 3.8, and with the addition of the following line: set skip on { lo } doesn't the lo part of the following line become redundant: antis

Re: 3.8 pf.conf question

2005-12-04 Thread Moritz Grimm
eric wrote: On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 11:39:01 -0800, Rodney Hopkins proclaimed... I was looking at the pf.conf included with 3.8, and with the addition of the following line: set skip on { lo } doesn't the lo part of the following line become redundant: antispoof quick for { lo $int_if } It

Re: 3.8 pf.conf question

2005-12-04 Thread eric
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 11:39:01 -0800, Rodney Hopkins proclaimed... > I was looking at the pf.conf included with 3.8, and with the > addition of the following line: > > set skip on { lo } > > doesn't the lo part of the following line become redundant: > > antispoof quick for { lo $int_if } It