theo wrote:
> Nothing you are saying has any relevance to the use of OpenBSD.
As much as one might wish it were, OpenBSD is *not* an island: the
place of OpenBSD in the world *is* a relevant issue. Real life, y'know.
> The chatter is useless.
You just can't stand to see yourself being criticised
"j3s" wrote:
> On 4/14/20 11:02 PM, zap wrote:
>> I'll be honest, i like libre software, but, libre software that is
>> insecure, aka redhat's bs, openssl, java, etc... is barely better than
>> proprietary software.
>
> this is crap.
That stuff sure shares a lot of traits w/ one's typical proprie
Haai,
"zap" wrote:
>
> I think theo is about the same as Linus in how foul he can get...
As meobserved, Theo's agression is more of passive kind. Dunno if that's
an improvement...
> but on the other hand, he at least doesn't wreck his software with
> pointless things like redhat's crap, systemd
Nothing you are saying has any relevance to the use of OpenBSD.
The chatter is useless.
Stop it.
zap wrote:
>
>
> I think theo is about the same as Linus in how foul he can get...
>
> but on the other hand, he at least doesn't wreck his software with
> pointless things like redhat's crap, s
On 4/14/20 11:02 PM, zap wrote:
I'll be honest, i like libre software, but, libre software that is
insecure, aka redhat's bs, openssl, java, etc... is barely better than
proprietary software.
this is crap.
unix philosphy should have been kept in linux. Because it wasn't,
well... Linux and GN
I think theo is about the same as Linus in how foul he can get...
but on the other hand, he at least doesn't wreck his software with
pointless things like redhat's crap, systemd for example, he seems to
prefer the keep it simple stupid approach from what I have seen. I much
prefer security over
6 matches
Mail list logo
