Re: RAIDframe stability and reliability

2006-02-05 Thread Joakim Roubert
On 30/01/06 08:32, Joachim Schipper wrote: > that a dying drive on a IDE bus is likely to confuse the bus > sufficiently that the other drive on the bus (if there is one) goes down > as well. I guess this would be avoided when the drives are on different buses, if there is space for using only

Re: RAIDframe stability and reliability

2006-01-31 Thread Dave Diller
> > Yeah, 20% or so, with RAIDframe being the only change: > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5281094 Sep 16 21:30 bsd-stock-3.8-install > > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6072989 Jan 22 10:28 bsd-raid-38stab-012206 > > no, that's 15%. Rounded to 5 and 6, did the math after sending ;-) > but stil

Re: RAIDframe stability and reliability

2006-01-31 Thread kami petersen
Dave Diller skrev: The main reason RAIDframe is not in GENERIC, I seem to recall, is that it makes the kernel quite a bit bigger for no gain in the average case. Yeah, 20% or so, with RAIDframe being the only change: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5281094 Sep 16 21:30 bsd-stock-3.8-install -rwxr-

Re: RAIDframe stability and reliability

2006-01-30 Thread Nick Nauwelaerts
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:30:10 -0700 David Wilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know RAIDframe is not in GENERIC, but I was wondering if anyone > could speak to the stability and reliability of RAIDframe in 3.8. I > find myself really wanting to use software RAID 1 and haven't had any > problems in

Re: RAIDframe stability and reliability

2006-01-30 Thread David Wilk
what bigger isn't always better? how unamerican... : ) thanks alot guys, It's good to hear folks have had good experiences with it. I've already been bitten with the ungraceful way RAIDframe deals with misconfigs. man, it panics at the first sign of trouble! On 1/30/06, Dave Diller <[EMAIL PRO

Re: RAIDframe stability and reliability

2006-01-30 Thread Dave Diller
> The main reason RAIDframe is not in GENERIC, I seem to recall, is that > it makes the kernel quite a bit bigger for no gain in the average case. Yeah, 20% or so, with RAIDframe being the only change: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5281094 Sep 16 21:30 bsd-stock-3.8-install -rwxr-xr-x 1 root whee

Re: RAIDframe stability and reliability

2006-01-29 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 03:30:10PM -0700, David Wilk wrote: > I know RAIDframe is not in GENERIC, but I was wondering if anyone could > speak to the stability and reliability of RAIDframe in 3.8. I find myself > really wanting to use software RAID 1 and haven't had any problems in > testing thus f

RAIDframe stability and reliability

2006-01-29 Thread David Wilk
I know RAIDframe is not in GENERIC, but I was wondering if anyone could speak to the stability and reliability of RAIDframe in 3.8. I find myself really wanting to use software RAID 1 and haven't had any problems in testing thus far. Any experiences would be good to hear. thanks!