Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> int mitigation has always made quite some difference, but now it is even
> more, I agree.
>
I could never see a difference on Soekris boxes with a 400 us delay in if_sis
in earlier OpenBSD versions. But I never tried higher delays than that.
> nonth
* Chris Cappuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-06 21:17]:
> Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Sis(4) is plaing in the same league as rl(4). It works fine and I never
> > had porblems with it but I would never use it in a router with high
> > performance needs.
>
> No, the interface o
Hi,
Thanks for all the input, we have decided to go for a Dell PE860 with an
Intel quad pro/1000 GT adapter.
Best regards
Fredrik Carlsson
Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sis(4) is plaing in the same league as rl(4). It works fine and I never
> had porblems with it but I would never use it in a router with high
> performance needs.
No, the interface on sis is not as bad as the old rl chips. Also, the 83816
sis supports i
On 6/6/07, Ronnie Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henning Brauer a icrit :
> * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
>> I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
>> was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
>> (pf disabled) measured using
> Henning has something in saying that most of the tools aren't great,
> in the end all benchmarks are artificial in some measure. Replaying
> traffic is equally artificial as it's only indicative of the traffic
> you recorded - which is likely to be biased towards whatever was
> happening at the
* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-06 17:52]:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
> >> I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
> >> was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
> >> (pf disabled) measured using
Dave Harrison wrote:
> However I'm not aware of any tools that handle that kind of
> distributed benchmark.. anyone ?
>
httperf can be run in an array of clients (--client option), although
there is currently no way to automatically aggregate the results.
--
Theodore Bullock, <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
>> I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
>> was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
>> (pf disabled) measured using iperf.
>
> the single-stream tcp test iperf uses is pret
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
was unaware that moose farts were slow. you learn something new every day :)
i believe the speed of moose farts varies in relationship to the moose,
meese?, distance from Calgary.
Henning Brauer wrote:
single tcp session benches are completely meaningless and will not max
out any device faster than a moose fart
was unaware that moose farts were slow. you learn something new every day :)
* Dave Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-06 13:52]:
> If you're just looking for a big number, open a single TCP session and
> send alot of traffic through it so you don't have to continually start
> new sessions (sessions are comparatively expensive).
single tcp session benches are completely
Matt Rowley wrote:
>>> best "simulation" is recording your real-world traffic using tcpdump and
>>> then use tcpreplay. but that is tricky too.
>> Henning has something in saying that most of the tools aren't great,
>> in the end all benchmarks are artificial in some measure. Replaying
>> traffic
> > best "simulation" is recording your real-world traffic using tcpdump and
> > then use tcpreplay. but that is tricky too.
>
> Henning has something in saying that most of the tools aren't great,
> in the end all benchmarks are artificial in some measure. Replaying
> traffic is equally artific
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Ronnie Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-06 13:04]:
>> Henning Brauer a icrit :
>>> * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged m
* Ronnie Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-06 13:04]:
> Henning Brauer a icrit :
> >* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
> >>I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
> >>was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
> >>(pf disabled) measur
Henning Brauer a icrit :
* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
(pf disabled) measured using iperf.
the single-stream tcp test iperf uses is pretty mean
* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
> I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
> was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
> (pf disabled) measured using iperf.
the single-stream tcp test iperf uses is pretty meaningless
(unless.. well,
* Fredrik Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:04]:
> Jason Dixon wrote:
> >On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:26:19 +0200, Fredrik Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
> >>quad ethernet cards people recom
* Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/06/05 18:10, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
> >
> > > Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
> > > least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and currently I have one
> > > installed in a de
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:49:05PM -0500, Todd Alan Smith wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:10:08PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> >> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
> >>
> >> > Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun
On 6/5/07, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:10:08PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
>
> > Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
> > least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and curren
On 2007/06/05 18:10, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
>
> > Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
> > least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and currently I have one
> > installed in a dell 1550 that works just fine. You can
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:10:08PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
>
> > Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
> > least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and currently I have one
> > installed in a dell 1550 that work
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
> Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
> least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and currently I have one
> installed in a dell 1550 that works just fine. You can find the Sun
> quad cards for really cheap off of eb
Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and currently I have one
installed in a dell 1550 that works just fine. You can find the Sun
quad cards for really cheap off of ebay. I think I picked mine up for
around $40 USD.
Daniel Polak wrote:
Original message from Fredrik Carlsson at 5-6-2007 18:26
I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about
what quad ethernet cards people recommend?
The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well
supported by OpenBSD), but what quad ca
On Jun 5, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Fredrik Carlsson wrote:
A mix of all that ;)
It's in the startup phase so I can't provide that much info yet,
but there will be a lot of machines and we will be routing much
traffic internally and to Internet. The budget is quite important,
so if there is a c
Fredrik Carlsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
> quad ethernet cards people recommend?
> The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
> by OpenBSD), but what quad cards should i buy? what cards have good
> perfo
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Fredrik Carlsson wrote:
Hi,
I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
quad ethernet cards people recommend?
The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
by OpenBSD), but what quad cards should i buy? what cards h
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:26:19 +0200, Fredrik Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
quad ethernet cards people recommend?
The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
by Op
Fredrik Carlsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
> quad ethernet cards people recommend?
> The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
> by OpenBSD), but what quad cards should i buy? what cards have good
> perfo
Original message from Fredrik Carlsson at 5-6-2007 18:26
I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about
what quad ethernet cards people recommend?
The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well
supported by OpenBSD), but what quad cards should i buy? wha
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:26:19 +0200, Fredrik Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
> quad ethernet cards people recommend?
> The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
> by OpenBSD), but w
Hi,
I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
quad ethernet cards people recommend?
The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
by OpenBSD), but what quad cards should i buy? what cards have good
performance?
Best regards
Fredrik Ca
Anyone got any suggestions for getting this card started correctly? Seen
the question in older posts, but never an answer (running sparc64 generic).
kind regards
David
qec0 at sbus0 slot 0 offset 0x2 vector 4 ipl 2: 128K memory
qe0 at qec0 slot 0 offset 0x0 rev 1iomap insert error: 12 for va
36 matches
Mail list logo
